LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN THE NORTH: ASSESSING THE IMPACT ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

Original article

Download article 

Tatyana V. Tikhonova

Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North, Komi Science Centre, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia, tikhonova@iespn.komisc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-2912-1696

 

Abstract. In the context of sustainable forestry, biodiversity conservation assessment is a necessary element in asset and service accounting. Logging is an important driver of economic growth in the northern regions of Russia. The past twenty years have seen changes in timber harvesting technologies and forest management principles, which has led to an increase in research interest  in identifying ecosystem responses in terms of biodiversity conservation. This study aims to assess changes in biodiversity within  the active forest management territory of the Komi Republic, encompassing ten municipal districts and 24 forestry areas.  The objectives of the study include evaluating the impact of factors such as population density, road network, and intact area  on biodiversity preservation. Statistical analysis methods were utilized to assess the biodiversity status, focusing on the number of rare species threatened by logging. The analysis studied changes in species abundance, territorial distribution across forestry areas, and changes in their conservation status. Using statistical and factor analysis methods, the study identified the impact of forestry and anthropogenic factors on the conservation of species. The novelty of the research consists in identifying the stability degree of ecosystems by analyzing the state of large areas that have experienced long-term anthropogenic impacts on the Komi Republic territory. Most forests within the active forest management zone demonstrated favorable ecosystem conditions, with logging activities causing lichen disappearance and reduced fish numbers only in individual small areas. The anthropogenic impact had minimal influence on the number of rare species due to low population and road network density. Large areas of undisturbed forests contribute to the natural preservation of biodiversity, but their significant reduction in the southern area causes a threat to the existence of rare species. The greatest impact on the change in biodiversity on the territories affected by active forest management is caused by factors such as the level of territorial exploration, the preservation of undisturbed forests, and selective logging.  The practical significance of this study lies in the potential application of the proposed algorithm by large Russian forest businesses when conducting their operations.

Keywords: ecosystem accounting, biodiversity, forestry, rare species, road network density, intact forests, logging, Komi Republic

Acknowledgments: this article was prepared within the framework of the Research and Development Program titled “Sustainable Resource Use of the Northern Region: Factors and Models” (State Registration No. 121021800128-8, 2021–2023).

For citation: Tikhonova T. V. Logging activities in the North: Assessing the impact on biodiversity conservation. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2023, no. 2, pp. 24–37. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2023.80.002.

References

  1. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting — Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). White cover publication, pre-edited text subject to official editing. 2021. Available at: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting (accessed 15.02.2022).
  2. GEO BON’s 2025 Vision Statement and Goals. Available at: https://geobon.org/about/vision-goals/ (accessed 15.05.2022).
  3. Natural Capital Coalition. 2016. Natural Capital Protocol. Available at: www.naturalcapitalcoalition.org/protocol (accessed 05.03.2022).
  4. Gosudarstvennyi doklad “O sostoyanii okruzhayushchei sredy Respubliki Komi v 2021 godu” [State report “On the state of the environment of the Komi Republic in 2021”]. Syktyvkar, Minprirody Respubliki Komi, 2022, 167 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Lesnoe khozyaistvo i lesnye resursy Respubliki Komi [Forestry and forest resources of the Komi Republic]. Moscow, Izdatel’sko-prodyuserskii tsentr “Dizain. Informatsiya. Kartografiya”, 2000, 512 р. (In Russ.).
  6. Ulanova N. G. Vosstanovitel’naya dinamika rastitel’nosti sploshnykh vyrubok i massovykh vetrovalov v el’nikakh yuzhnoi tajgi (na primere evropeiskoi chasti Rossii): avtoref. dis. dokt. biol. nauk [Restoration dynamics of vegetation after clear cutting and blowdowns in Southern fir tree taiga (using the example of the European part of Russia). Sci. (Biology) dis. abstract]. Moscow, 2006, 46 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Rai E. A., Burova N. V., Slastnikov S. I. Vliyanie ostavleniya derev’ev pri sploshnoi rubke na floristicheskoe raznoobrazie [Effect of tree abandonment in clear cutting on floristic diversity]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki [Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Natural Sciences], 2012, no. 3, pp. 54–58. (In Russ.).
  8. Burova N. V., Torbik D. N., Feklistov P. A. Izmenenie floristicheskogo raznoobraziya posle vyborochnykh rubok v el’nikakh chernichnykh [Change in floristic diversity after selective cuttings in forests with blueberries and fir trees]. Lesnoi vestnik [Forestry Bulletin], 2010, no. 5, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.).
  9. Ulanova N. G. Osnovnye trendy dinamiki bioraznoobraziya posle prirodnykh i antropogennykh “katastrof” v el’nikakh Evropeiskoi chasti Rossii [Main trends of biodiversity dynamics after natural and anthropogenic “catastrophes” in spruce forests of the European part of Russia]. Samarskaya Luka: problemy regional’noi i global’noi ekologii [Samara Luka: problems of regional and global ecology], 2018, no. 4, pp. 84–92. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2073-1035-2018-10094.
  10. Dymov A. A. Vliyanie sploshnykh rubok v boreal’nykh lesakh Rossii na pochvy (obzor) [The impact of clearcutting in boreal forests of Russia on soils: a review]. Pochvovedenie [Soil Science], 2017, no. 7, pp. 787–798. (In Russ.).
  11. Tikhonova T. V. Podkhody k izmereniyu ekosistemnykh uslug na territorii lesopol’zovaniya [Approaches to measuring ecosystem services on a forest management territory]. Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo centra Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya “Ekonomicheskie nauki” [Proceedings of the Komi Science Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series “Economic sciences”], 2022, no. 3, pp. 56–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19110/1994-5655-2022-3-56–65.
  12. Likhanova N. V. Izmenenie bioraznoobraziya i massy rastenii napochvennogo pokrova el’nikov srednei tajgi posle sploshnolesosechnoi rubki [Biodiversity and biomass changes of ground cover plants on clear felling sites of spruce forests in the middle taiga]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2012, vol. 14, no. 1 (5), pp. 1309–1312. (In Russ.).
  13. Ptichnikov A. V., Karelin D. V., Kotlyakov V. M., Kuznetsova D. A., Pautov Y. A., Borovlev A. Y., Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovsky V. I. Primenimost’ mezhdunarodnykh indikatorov otsenki neitral’nogo balansa degradatsii zemel’ k Boreal’nym lesam Rossii [Indicators in estimation of land degradation neutrality for Russian boreal forests]. Doklady Akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019, vol. 489, no. 2, pp. 195–198. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-56524892195-198.
  14. Mace Georgina M., Barrett Mike, Burgess Neil D., Cornell Sarah E., Freeman Robin, Grooten Monique, Purvis Andy. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nature Sustainability, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 448–451. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0130-0.
  15. Rendon Paula, Erhard Markus, Maes Joachim, Burkhard Benjamin. Analysis of trends in mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition in Europe. Ecosystem and people, 2019, vol. 15, pp. 156–172. DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2019.1609581.
  16. UK natural capital accounts: 2022. Estimates of the financial and societal value of natural resources to people in the UK. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/bulletins/uknaturalcapitalaccounts/2022 (accessed 13.03.2023).
  17. Grummo D. G. Otsenka bioraznoobraziya nazemnykh ekosistem na osnove tsifrovoi karty rastitel’nosti [Assessment of biodiversity of terrestrial ecosystems based on a digital vegetation map]. Issledovaniya [Botany. Researches], 2021, no. 50, pp. 155–170. (In Russ.).
  18. Harrington Richard, Anton Christian, Dawson Terence P., de Bello Francesco, Feld Christian K., Haslett John R., Kluvánkova-Oravská Tatiana, Kontogianni Areti, Lavorel Sandra, Luck Gary W., Rounsevell Mark D. A., Samways Michael J., Settele Josef, Skourtos Michalis, Spangenberg Joachim H., Vandewalle Marie, Zobel Martin, Harrison Paula A. Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary. Biodiversity and conservation, 2010, no. 19, pp. 2773–2790. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9834-9.
  19. Scholes R., Biggs R. A biodiversity intactness index. Nature, 2005, vol. 434, pp. 45–49.
  20. Tsibulsky V.R., Arefev S.P., Novikov V.P., Solovyev I.G., Govorkov D.A. Opredelenie indeksa bioraznoobraziya Shennona rastitel’nykh soobshchestv, obrazovannykh derev’yami-edifikatorami na primere lesov severa Zapadnoi Sibiri [Determination of the Shannon Biodiversity Index of Plant Communities Formed by Edificatory trees using the Example of Forests in the North of Western Siberia]. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University], 2021, no. 2 (54), pp. 32–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/21-2/04.
  21. Bednova O. V. Strukturnoe raznoobrazie lesnykh ekosistem kak indikator ikh narushennosti i osnova dlya prirodookhrannogo planirovaniya prostranstva gorodskikh OOPT [Structural diversity of forest ecosystems as an indicator of their disturbance and the basis for conservation planning of urban protected areas]. Lesnoi vestnik [Forestry Bulletin], 2012, no. 9, pp. 16–29. (In Russ.).
  22. Cambridge Institute for Sustainable Leadership. Healthy ecosystem metric framework: biodiversity impact. 2017. Available at: https://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/healthy-ecosystem-metric-framework.pdf (accessed 27.04.2022).
  23. Krasnaya kniga Respubliki Komi. Redkie i nakhodyashchiesya pod ugrozoi ischeznoveniya vidy rastenii i zhivotnykh [Red Book of the Komi Republic. Rare and endangered plant and animal species]. Moscow, Izd-vo DIK, 1998, 528 p. (In Russ.).
  24. Krasnaya Kniga Respubliki Komi [Red Book of the Komi Republic]. Syktyvkar, OOO “Komi respublikanskaya tipografiya”, 2019, 768 p. (In Russ.).
  25. Lesnoi plan Respubliki Komi [Forest Management Plan of the Komi Republic]. Syktyvkar, 2008, 156 p. (In Russ.).
  26. Lesnoi plan Respubliki Komi [Forest Management Plan of the Komi Republic]. Vologda, 2019, 314 p. (In Russ.).
  27. Kadastr osobo ohranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Respubliki Komi [Cadastre of specially protected natural territories of the Komi Republic]. Kirov, Kirovskaya oblastnaya tipografiya, 2014, 428 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Chislennost’, razmeshchenie, vozrastno-polovoi sostav naseleniya. Itogi Vserossiiskoi perepisi naseleniya 2010 goda. Respublika Komi. Tom 1: statisticheskii sbornik [Number, residence, age-sex composition of the population. Results of the 2010 All-Russian Population Census. Komi Republic. Volume 1: Statistical Compendium], Komistat. Syktyvkar, 2012, 99 p. (In Russ.).
  29. Gorodskie okruga i munitsipal’nye raiony respubliki Komi Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli. 2020: statisticheskii sbornik [Urban districts and municipal districts of the Komi Republic Socio-economic indicators. 2020: Statistical Compendium], Komistat. Syktyvkar, 2020, 286 p. (In Russ.).
  30. Mondi Europe and International Lesozagotovitel’naya deyatel’nost’ AO “Mondi SLPK” SEAT-analiz. Otchet o sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi otsenke [Mondi Europe and International. Logging at Mondi SLPK: SEAT analysis. A corporate and social report], 2015, 40 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.mondigroup.com/media/7432/ seat_syktyvkar_logging_operations_2015_russian_final_7november2016.pdf (accessed 05.04.2022).
  31. Natural Capital Report 2021 of the Tasmanian Forest Trust for the year ended 30 June 2021. Available at: https://forico.com.au/volumes/documents/Natural-Capital-Report/Natural-Capital-Report-2021.pdf (accessed 05.04.2022).
  32. SCA annual and sustainability report, 2020, 180 p. Available at: https://origin.sca.com/globalassets/sca-engelska/investors/annual-reports/sca_2020_eng.pdf (accessed 16.12.2021)
  33. Kasimov D. V., Pinaev V. E. Teoriya i praktika rascheta i minimizatsii ushcherba lesnym resursam: redkim vidam rastenii, drevesnym i pishchevym resursam, lekarstvennomu syr’yu [Theory and practice of calculating and minimizing damage to forest resources: rare plant species, wood and food resources, medicinal raw materials]. Moscow, Mir nauki, 2018, 95 p. (In Russ.).