THE MUNICIPAL STRUCTURE OF ARCTIC REGIONS: AN AGGLOMERATION-BASED SYSTEMS APPROACH  (A CASE STUDY OF THE YAMALO-NENETS AUTONOMOUS OKRUG)

Original article

Download article 

Gennady F. Detter1, Maria V. Zabolotnikova2, Anastasia O. Levkina3

1Research Center for the Study of the Arctic, Salekhard, Russia, detter@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-2590-0243

2Department of Domestic Policy in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Salekhard, Russia, zabolotnikovamv@gmail.com, ORCID 0009-0002-4162-4920

3Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia, aolyovkina@utmn.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-9938-5822

Abstract. One of the primary challenges in municipal reforms lies in the initial perception of the municipal and territorial structure merely as a means of managing administrative entities (cities, settlements, or regions), rather than as a mechanism for unlocking the economic potential of territories. This perspective detrimentally impacts the efficacy of regional strategic planning and hinders the attainment of goals outlined in national Arctic programs. It also acts as a barrier to innovation-driven socio-economic and sustainable development and impedes progress in the quality of life. This article explores the potential of employing an agglomeration-based systems approach to improve the system of municipal management in the Russian Arctic in alignment with sustainable development goals. Drawing upon the newly proposed model of an industrial cluster, alongside historical, socio-economic, and agglomeration-based systems analyses, we delineate the approximate boundaries of naturally forming macro-agglomerations, using the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (which encompasses Western, North-Eastern, and South-Eastern agglomerations) as a case study. The theoretical outcomes of the study include  the following: 1) an original model of an industrial cluster, which singles out fundamental elements and aspects of cluster management; 2) a methodology for identifying primary indicators of naturally occurring macro-agglomerations based  on the analysis of the fundamental elements identified within the model; 3) a pertinent analytical framework and procedure tailored to the features of Arctic regions. These tools can be used to refine the regional municipal management system  and shape socio-economic policies in the Russian Arctic, thereby bolstering the regions’ potential to achieve national strategic objectives. In conclusion, we propose recommendations to align the municipal and territorial structure of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug with emerging macro-agglomerations. This alignment is crucial for fostering a synergistic growth effect and realizing the socio-economic and innovative-driven development potential of the territories under consideration.

Keywords: Yamal, Arctic, macro-agglomeration, municipal structure, cluster approach, agglomeration-based systems approach, innovation-driven sustainable development

For citation: Detter G. F., Zabolotnikova M. V., Levkina A. O. The municipal structure of Arctic regions: An agglomeration-based systems approach (A case study of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug). Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 1, pp. 7–23. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.1.2024.83.001.

References

  1. Mirzaev M. A. Istoriko-pravovoi analiz razvitiya mestnogo samoupravleniya v 1990-e gody v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Historical and legal analysis of the development of local self-government in the 1990s in the Russian Federation]. Yuridicheskii vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Legal Bulletin of the Dagestan State University], 2018, vol. 26, 2, pp. 34–38. (In Russ.).
  2. Solzhenitsyn A. I. Kak nam obustroit’ Rossiyu (posil’nye soobrazheniya) [How can we develop Russia (feasible considerations)]. Publitsistika: v 3 t. T. 1. [Journalism: in 3 volumes. Vol. 1]. Yaroslavl’, Verhnyaya Volga, 1995,   538–599. (In Russ.).
  3. Egorova N. E. Munitsipal’naya reforma v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i struktura organov mestnogo samoupravleniya [Municipal reform in the Russian Federation and the structure of local governments]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2007, vol. 12, no. 132, pp. 110–117. (In Russ.).
  4. Leonov S. N. Problemnye rezul’taty i perspektivy reformy mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossii [Problematic results and prospects of the local self-government reform in Russia]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2017, no. 3, pp. 107–132. (In Russ.).
  5. Penziev M. V. Kontseptual’nye problemy reformy mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossii [Conceptual problems of local government reform in Russia]. Rossiiskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka [Russian Law: Education, Practice, Science], 2022, no. 4, pp. 63–71. (In Russ.).
  6. Bukhval’d E. M., Voroshilov N. V. Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiya munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii i reformirovaniya instituta mestnogo samoupravleniya [Current issues in the development of municipal entities and in reforming the institution of local self-government]. Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast], 2018, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 132–147. (In Russ.).
  7. Lappo G. M. Gorodskie aglomeratsii SSSR-Rossii: osobennosti dinamiki v XX v. [Urban agglomerations in the USSR and Russia: Changes in the twentieth century]. Rossiiskoe ekspertnoe obozrenie [Russian Expert Review], 2007, 22, no. 4–5, pp. 6–9. (In Russ.).
  8. Porter M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 1998, no. 6, pp. 77–90.
  9. Williamson O. E. The mechanisms of governance. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, 448 p.
  10. Brusco S. The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1982, no. 6, pp. 167–184.
  11. Christaller W. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Jena, University Microfilms, 1933, 331 s.
  12. Demin S. S., Selent’eva T. N. Problemy formirovaniya promyshlennoi politiki podderzhki klasterov [Problems of formation of industrial policy of clusters clusters]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii internet-zhurnal [Russian Economics Online Journal], 2018, no. 4, p. 32. (In Russ.).
  13. Koshcheev D. A., Tretyakova E. A. Fenomen industrial’nogo klastera: sistemno-aglomeratsionnyi podkhod [The phenomenon of industrial cluster: systematic agglomeration approach]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 451–465. (In Russ.).
  14. Blus’ P. I., Ganin O. B., Ganin I. O., Sibiryakov A. P. Aglomeratsionnyi podkhod k obosnovaniyu novoi paradigmy Strategii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Permskogo munitsipal’nogo raiona na 2016–2030 gody [Agglomerative approach to justify a new paradigm of social economic development strategy in Perm municipal district for 2016–2030]. Ars Administrandi, 2016, no. 1, pp. 133–159. (In Russ.).
  15. Detter G., Tukkel J., Ljovkina A. E3S Web of Conferences. Arctic region and arctic cities VS sustainable region and smart cities, 2021, vol. 258, p. 06003.
  16. Kolomeets N. E. O ponyatii administrativno-territorial’noi edinitsy [On concept of administrative-territory unit]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State power and local self-government], 2012, no. 11. 3–6. (In Russ.).
  17. Levkina A. O. Ustoichivoe innovatsionnoe razvitie obshchestva [Innovation-driven sustainable development of society]. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media, 2019, 369 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Merkur’ev V. V., Myagkov E. V. Razvitie aglomeratsii munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii kak faktor sovershenstvovaniya territorial’nogo razmeshcheniya naseleniya [Development of agglomerations of municipalities as a factor in improving the territorial distribution of the population]. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal], 2022, vol. 1, no. 69, article number: 6913. (In Russ.).
  19. Ulyaeva A. G. Analiz metodicheskikh podkhodov k vydeleniyu aglomeratsionnykh obrazovanii [An analysis of methodological approaches to the determination of agglomerations]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 2016, vol. 12, no. 435, pp. 17–27. (In Russ.).
  20. Iglovskaya N. S. Osobennosti urbanizatsii i formirovanie gorodskikh aglomeratsii na Severe Rossii [Features of urbanization and the formation of urban agglomerations in the North of Russia]. Arctic Environmental Research [Arctic Environmental Research], 2011, 1, pp. 5–12. (In Russ.).
  21. Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1929, 256 p.
  22. Detter G. F., Konstantinova T. S. Yamal — proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Yamal: past, present, future]. Nauchnyi vestnik Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Scientific Bulletin of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug], 2016, v 3, no. 92, pp. 125–131. (In Russ.).
  23. Fishman L. I., Ivanov M. Yu. Strategii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii: opyt analiza [Strategies for the socio-economic development of municipalities: An analysis]. Innovatsii. Investitsii [Intellect. Innovation. Investments], 2018, no. 9, pp. 71–78. (In Russ.).
  24. Robets D. S. Razvitie aglomeratsionnykh sistem industrial’no-agrarnogo tipa na osnove mekhanizma munitsipal’no-chastnogo partnerstva (na materialakh Barnaul’skoi aglomeratsii): … kand. ekon. nauk [Development of agglomeration systems of the industrial and agrarian type based on the mechanism of public-private partnership (A case study of the Barnaul agglomeration). PhD (Economics) dissertation]. Barnaul, AltGU, 2020, 182 p. (In Russ.).
  25. Cappellin R. Territorial knowledge management: towards a metrics of the cognitive dimension of agglomeration economies. International Journal of Technology Management, 2003, vol. 26, no. 2–4, pp. 303–325. (In Russ.).