THE POLAR-ALPINE BOTANICAL GARDEN-INSTITUTE AS A SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA AND A PLACE  WITH POTENTIAL FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT: PERCEPTIONS OF KIROVSK AND APATITY CITIZENS

Original article

Download article

Alyona S. Davydova1, Denis A. Davydov2

1Barents Centre of the Humanities of the Kola Science Centre, Apatity, Russia

2Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute of the Kola Science Centre, Apatity, Russia

1a.davidova@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-7967-5953

2d.davydov@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-0866-4747

 Abstract. Today, the demand for environmentally responsible tourism is growing noticeably. Travelers demonstrate an interest  in exploring undisturbed nature that can be found in special protection areas. As part of a network of such areas, botanical gardens can become important elements in the development of sustainable tourism in regions and cities. However, this is no easy task,  as it requires preserving natural ecosystems while providing comfortable conditions for tourists.

One of the foundations for environmental activities is the opinion of local communities about nature conservation.  As the first step towards promoting sustainable tourism on the territory of the Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute  of N. A. Avrorin (PABGI; Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences), the only botanical garden in Russia operating in the Arctic, a survey was conducted to investigate the opinions of local residents about this institution  as a special protection area and the possibilities for tourism development. The Botanical Garden is an essential element  of the historical and cultural landscape not only of the city of Kirovsk but also of the neighboring city of Apatity.  The respondents generally demonstrated a high level of environmental awareness. However, questions about the PABGI’s territorial boundaries and the species of plants listed in the Red Book of the Murmansk region posed challenges. The survey revealed  that residents of the Kirovsko-Apatitsky district have a positive attitude towards tourism development on the PABGI’s territory.  They recognize that it is a protected area and that maintaining special visitation rules is crucial. The results indicate that PABGI needs  to intensify its efforts in organizing educational events and interacting with the population, as respondents repeatedly noted the need to expand such activities. According to the citizens, the territory of the botanical garden is a platform where researchers, residents, nature, and culture can interact. Currently, PABGI faces difficulties in performing functions other than its primary ones of natural ecosystem conservation and research. This is largely because special regulations are required on the territory of protected areas,  and there are not enough opportunities for sustainable tourism development. A consistent strategy for improving and developing tourism infrastructure needs to be developed in the future.

Keywords: Murmansk region, botanical garden, sustainable tourism, protected areas, citizen perceptions

Acknowledgments: this article was prepared as part of government contracts with the Barents Centre of the Humanities  of the Kola Science Centre (contract No. 0226-2019-0066) and the Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute  of the Kola Science Centre (contract No. 1021071612832-8-1.6.11). We would like to thank the Beautiful Children  in a Beautiful World charity foundation for supporting the Polar Amulets project implemented at the Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, which inspired us to conduct this study.

For citation: Davydova A. S., Davydov D. A. The Polar-Alpine Botanic Garden-Institute as special protection area and a place with potential for tourism development: visions of Kirovsk and Apatity citizens. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2023, no. 1, pp. 133–149. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.1.2023.79.009

References

  1. Zhelnina Z. Yu. Turizm Murmanskoi oblasti kak draiver razvitiia territorii [Tourism of the Murmansk region as a driver of territory development]. Obshhestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Society: Politics, Economics, Law], 2021, No 9, P. 65–75. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2021.9.11
  2. United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, June 5, 1992, 31 ILM 818, entered into force Dec. 29, 1993. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-un-en.pdf
  3. Davydov D. A, Borovichev E. A, Petrova O. V. Konceptsiia zonirovaniia OOPT Poliarno-al’piiskii botanicheskii sad-institut v tseliah okhrany redkikh vidov i razvitiia turizma [A zoning concept of Polar-Alpine Botanical  Garden-Institute as protected area for nature conservation and tourism development]. InterGIS [InterCarto. InterGIS], 2021, Vol. 27, No 3, P. 312–322. https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-3-27-312-322 (In Russ.)
  4. Bogolitsyn K. G., Bolotova N. L., Gromtsev A. N., Danilov P. I., Dyogteva S. V., Yefimov V. A., Zhirov V. K., Kovalyov D. N., Kryshen’ A. M., Kuznetsov O. L., Maksutova N. K., Mamontov V. N., Masloboev V. A., Noskov G. A., Taskaev A. I., Titov A. F. O edinoi mezhregional’noi sisteme osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii na Evropeiskom Severe [On the integrated interregional system of protected areas in the European North]. Trudy Karel’skogo nauchnogo centra RAN [Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS], 2011, No 2, P. 4–11. (In Russ.)
  5. Borovichev E. A., Petrov V. N., Petrova O. V., Koroleva N. E. Set’ OOPT Murmanskoi oblasti: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Protected areas network in the Murmansk region: yesterday, today, and tomorrow]. Arktika i Sever [The Arctic and North], 2018, No 32, P. 107–120. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.32.107 (In Russ.)
  6. Mokhoobraznye i sosudistye rasteniya territorii Polyarno-al’piiskogo botanicheskogo sada (Khibinskie gory, Kol’skii poluostrov) [Bryophytes and vascular plants of the territory of the Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden (Khibiny Mountains, Kola Peninsula)], Ed. N.A. Konstantinova, Apatity: KSC RAS, 2001, 91 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Kuzevanov V. Ya. Sovremennye botanicheskie sady kak eko-sotsial’nye resursy gorodskogo razvitiya: ot idei “sad v gorode” k “gorod v sadu” [Contemporary botanic gardens as eco-social resources of urban development: from the idea of “garden in the city” to the “city in the garden”]. Sovremennye problemy obrazovaniia i nauki: materialy mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. [Modern problems of education and science: Proceedings of the intern.  -practical conf.], Irkutsk: iz-vo IGU, 2017, P. 174–180. (In Russ.)
  8. Kuzevanov V. Ya., Sizykh S. V. Ekologicheskie resursy botanicheskikh sadov: svyaz’ bioraznoobraziya i obshchestva [Ecological resources of botanical gardens: Connection between biodiversity and society]. Energetika [Materials Science. Energy], 2010, Vol. 3, P. 161–169. (In Russ.)
  9. Eagles P. F. J., McCool S. F., Haynes C. D. Sustainable tourism in protected areas. Guidelines for planning and management, UK: Thanet Press Limited, 2002, 183 pp.
  10. Smirnov S. A. Strategiya ustoichivogo razvitiya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii [Strategy for the sustainable development of special protection areas]. Vestnik universiteta [Bulletin of the University], 2013, No 20, P. 164–168. (In Russ.)
  11. Pomorov D. V., Shagarov M. N. K voprosu ob ustoichivom razvitii osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii (na primere prirodnogo ornitologicheskogo parka v Imeretinskoi nizmennosti) [On the issue of the sustainable development of special protection areas (case study of a natural ornithological park in the Imeretinskaya lowland)]. Ustoichivoe razvitie osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii. Materialy I Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Sustainable development of specially protected natural areas. Proceedings  of the I All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference], Sochi, 2014, P. 16–19. (In Russ.)
  12. Nolte B. Can Tourism Promote Regional Development in Protected Areas? Case Studies from the Biosphere Reserves Slovensky Kras and Polana, Slovakia. In: Protected areas and regional development in Europe. Towards a new model for the 21st century, London: Routledge, 2007, P. 55–73.
  13. Saarinen J. Protected areas and regional development issues in northern peripheries: Nature protection, traditional economies and tourism in the Urho Kekkonen National Park, Finland. In: Protected areas and regional development in Europe. Towards a new model for the 21st century, London: Routledge, 2007, P. 199–211. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602639
  14. Shaparov A. E., Sokolova F. H. Turizm kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiya sub”ektov Arkticheskoi zony RF [Tourism as a factor in the sustainable development of the Arctic federal subjects of the Russian Federation]. Rossiia: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiia [Russia: Trends and Development Prospects], 2021, Vol. 17, No 3, P. 962–965. (In Russ.)
  15. Puhakka R., Sarkki S., Cottrell S. P., Siikamäki P. Local Discourses and International Initiatives: Sociocultural Sustainability of Tourism in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2009, Vol. 17, No 5, 529–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802713457
  16. McCool S. F. Constructing partnerships for protected area tourism planning in an era of change and messiness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2009, Vol. 17, No 2, P. 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495733
  17. Western D., Wright R. M. The background to community-based conservation. In: Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation, USA: Island Press, 1994, P. 1–12.
  18. Saarinen J. Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 2006, Vol. 33, No 4, 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.007
  19. Torn A., Siikamaki P., Tolvanen A., Kauppila P., Rämet J. Local people, nature conservation and tourism in northeastern Finland. Ecology and Society, 2008, Vol. 13, No 1, available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art8/
  20. Haukeland J. V. Tourism stakeholders’ perceptions of national park management in Norway. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2011, Vol. 19, No 2, P. 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2010.517389
  21. Murphy P.E. Tourism: a community approach, New York-London: Methuen, 1985, 200 pp.
  22. Shortt G. Attitudes of tourism planners: implications for human resource development. Tourism Management, 1994, Vol. 15, No 6, P. 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(94)90065-5
  23. Pearce P. L., Moscardo G., Ross G. F. Tourism community relationships, UK, Pergamon: Emerald Publishing Limited, 1996, 330 pp.
  24. Fiallo E. A., Jacobson S. K. Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation, 1995, Vol. 22, No 3, P. 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290001064X
  25. Trakolis D. Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, Vol. 61, No 3, P. 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0410
  26. Sekhar N. U. Local people’s attitude towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 2003, Vol. 69, No 4, P. 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.002
  27. Tosun C. Towards a typology of community participation in the tourism development process // Anatolia. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 1999, Vol. 10, No 2, P. 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.1999.96869752000
  28. Tosun C. Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tourism Management, 2000, Vol. 21, No 6, P. 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1
  29. Kalugin Yu. G., Medvedeva A. A., Musinova L. P. Opyt raboty s posetitelyami OOPT “Dendrologicheskie parki i botanicheskie sady” na primere Botanicheskogo sada Petra Velikogo BIN RAN [Working with visitors to the Dendrological Parks and Botanical Gardens: Case study of Saint Petersburg Botanical Garden]. Sbornik statei VI Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Ustoichivoe razvitie osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii” [Collection of articles of the VI All-Russian scientific and practical conference “Sustainable development of special protection areas”], Sochi: GOKU “Prirodnyi ornitologicheskii park v Imeretinskoi nizmennosti”, 2019,   6, P. 137–144. (In Russ.)
  30. Naumtcev Y. V. Sovremennaya ustoichivaya pozitsiya botanicheskogo sada v mestnom soobshchestve i prostranstve –– ot metodov upravleniya do vozdeistviya na obshchestvo [The modern sustainable position of a botanical garden in the local community and region – from management methods to society impact].  Rol’ botanicheskikh sadov v sokhranenii i obogashchenii prirodnoi i kul’turnoi flory. Materialy Vserossiiskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoi 20-letiyu Botanicheskogo Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova [The role of botanical gardens in the conservation and enrichment of natural and cultural flora. Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference with international participation, dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Botanical North-Eastern Federal University. M. K. Ammosova], Jakutsk,  2021, P. 111–117. (In Russ.)
  31. Goncharenko N. V. Ekoprosveshchenie segodnya: potrebnost’ obshchestva i vozmozhnosti botanicheskikh sadov (iz opyta Botanicheskogo sada IGU) [Environmental today: the societies need and the botanical gardens possibilities]. Hortus botanicus, 2018, Vol. 1, P. 620–628. https://doi.org/10.15393/j4.art.2018.5684 (In Russ.)
  32. Kholodova R. A. Botanicheskii sad BelGU –– ob”ekt ekologicheskogo turizma [Botanical Garden of BelSU as an environmental tourism destination]. Materialy VII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii shkol’nikov “Osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii: sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya” [Proceedings of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference for Schoolchildren “Specially Protected Natural Territories: State, Problems and Prospects of Development”], Belgorod, Vezelitsa, 2008, P. 129–133. (In Russ.)
  33. Petin A. N., Polshina A. A, Yasenok S. N. Formirovanie turistsko-ekskursionnogo potentsiala Botanicheskogo sada NIU “BELGU” [Formation of tourist and excursion potential of Botanical Garden NRU of BELSU]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Modern Problems of Science and Education: Electronic Scientific Journal], 2013, No 5, URL: http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/handle/123456789/14794 (In Russ.)
  34. Lukichev A. B. Obshchii plan upravleniia ustoichivym turizmom na osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriyakh [The general management plan of sustainable tourism in protected areas]. Rossiiskii zhurnal ekoturizma [Russian Journal of Ecotourism], 2012, No 3, P. 3–8. (In Russ.)
  35. Stepanitskii V. B. Ekologicheskii turizm na osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriyakh Rossii: problemy i perspektivy [Ecological tourism in the protected areas of Russia: Problems and prospects]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Innovatsionnaya politika v sfere sokhraneniia kul’turnogo naslediia i razvitiia kul’turno-poznavatel’nogo turizma» [Proceedings of the International Conference “Innovative Policies in Preserving Cultural Heritage and Developing Cultural and Educational Tourism”], Moscow, 2005, URL: http://tourlib.net/statti_tourism/stepanicky.htm (In Russ.)
  36. Davydova A. S. Prirodnyi park kak chast’ strategii razvitiia ustoichivogo turizma v sele Teriberka (Murmanskaia oblast’) [Natural park as part of the strategy for the development of sustainable tourism in Teriberka settlement (Murmansk region)]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2021, No 4, P. 114–127. https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.4.2021.74.009 (In Russ.)
  37. Orlović‐Lovren V. The role of education in protected area sustainable governance. Management of Environmental Quality, 2011, Vol. 22, No 1, P. 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831111098471
  38. Kalugin Y. G., Musinova L. P. Osobennosti vedeniya nauchno-prosvetitel’skoi raboty v Botanicheskom sadu Petra Velikogo [Features of conducting scientific and educational activities in the Peter the Great Botanical Garden]. Rol’ botanicheskikh sadov i dendrariev v sokhranenii, izuchenii i ustoichivom ispol’zovanii raznoobraziya rastitel’nogo mira [The role of botanical gardens and arboretums in the conservation, study and sustainable use of plant diversity], Minsk: Medisont, 2017, Vol. 1, P. 393–396. (In Russ.)
  39. Krasnaia kniga Murmanskoi oblasti [Red Data Book of the Murmansk region], Kemerovo: Asia-Print, 2014, 578 p. (In Russ.).
  40. Kobayashi T., Hori Y., Nomoto N. Effects of trampling and vegetation removal on species diversity and micro-environment under different shade conditions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1997, Vol. 8, No 6, P. 873–880. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237032
  41. Jägerbrand A. K., Alatalo Ju. M. Effects of human trampling on abundance and diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in alpine heath vegetation, Northern Sweden. Springerplus, 2015, Vol. 4, No 1, 95 pp. https://doi:10.1186/s40064-015-0876-z
  42. Borovichev E. A., Koroleva N. E., Kozhin M. N., Melekhin A., Petrova O. V. Okhrana fitoraznoobraziya v gornopromyshlennom raione (Khibiny, Murmanskaya oblast’) [Protection of phytodiversity in a mining area (Khibiny mts., Murmansk region)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography], 2022, No 3, P. 31–41. (In Russ.)
  43. Kuzevanov V. Ya. Botanicheskie sady kak ekologicheskie resursy razvitiya tsivilizatsii [Botanical gardens as ecological resources for the civilization development]. Trudy Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings of Tomsk State University], 2010, Vol. 274, P. 218–220. (In Russ.)
  44. Canosa A., Graham A., Wilson E. Growing up in a tourist destination: developing an environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 2020, Vol. 26, No 7, P. 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1768224
  45. Goh E. Breaking the rules to venture off-trail at national parks: exploring salient beliefs through a planned behaviour approach. Tourism Recreation Research, 2020, Vol. 45, No 2, P. 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2019.1679526