METHODS FOR DEVELOPING STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES  IN THE MINING AND METALS SECTOR: A CASE STUDY OF NORNICKEL

Original article

Download article 

Alexander E. Nevolin1, Aleksey E. Cherepovitsyn2, Victoria M. Solovyova3

1Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

2,3Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

1aprec99@mail.ru, http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5752-5395

2alekseicherepov@inbox.ru, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-026X

3vikasolovyova9@gmail.com, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-8143

Abstract. At present, the growth of the mining industry is influenced by a high degree of uncertainty in macroeconomic parameters and geopolitical factors. To mitigate potential risks in the current environment, it is important to focus  on the development, justification, and selection of strategic alternatives that enable organizations not only to grow over  the medium and long term but also to adapt to changes in the external environment. In science, a substantial methodological foundation has been laid for strategic management and corporate planning. However, prevailing methodologies and tools, such as the extended SWOT analysis method, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix, the GE-McKinsey matrix, the ADL/LC matrix, and the Ansoff matrix, fail to account for the unique characteristics of companies operating in the mining  and processing sectors. This study aims to assess the applicability of matrix-based analysis methods in identifying and developing strategic alternatives for mining and metals companies. It undertakes a comprehensive review of methodological approaches to identifying business development strategies and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of existing methods and tools. In pursuit of practical validation, matrix methods are applied to the task of developing strategic alternatives for a company operating in the Arctic region, specifically, Nornickel. The study illuminates the potential  and limitations associated with employing these methods to solve management problems. The article gives methodological and practical recommendations aimed at enhancing the utility of matrix-based methods for their effective application  in the development of corporate strategies in the mining and metals sector.

Keywords: mining and metals companies, strategic alternatives, planning and management, matrix-based methods, Nornickel, Arctic zone

For citation: Nevolin A. E., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Solovyova V. M. Methods for developing strategic alternatives for the mining and metals sector: A case study of Nornickel. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2023, no. 2, рр. 44–60. https://doi:10.37614/2220-802X.3.2023.81.003. (In Russ.).

References

  1. Dmitrieva D., Chanysheva A., Solovyova V. A Conceptual Model for the Sustainable Development of the Arctic’s Mineral Resources Considering Current Global Trends: Future Scenarios, Key Actors, and Recommendations. Resources, 2023, no. 12, рр. 63.
  2. Syreyshchikova N. V., Pimenov D. Y., Yaroslavova E. N., Gupta M. K., Aamir M., Giasin K. Managing Risks in the Improved Model of Rolling Mill Loading: A Case Study. Risk Financial Manag.,2021, no. 14, рр. 359.
  3. Malyshev M. K. Vliyaniye zapadnykh sanktsiy na sposobnost’ krupnykh rossiyskikh korporatsiy tsvetnoy metallurgii k formirovaniyu byudzhetnykh dokhodov [Influence of Western sanctions on the ability of large Russian non-ferrous metallurgy corporations to generate budget revenues]. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya [Issues of Territorial Development], 2022, no. 2 (10), pp. 1–16. (In Russ.).
  4. Blinova E., Ponomarenko T., Tesovskaya S. Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies. Sustainability, 2023, no. 15, рр. 5763.
  5. Finger M., Rosenboim M. Going ESG: The Economic Value of Adopting an ESG Policy. Sustainability, 2022, no. 14, рр. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113917.
  6. Tsiglianu P., Romasheva N., Nenko A. Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation. Resources, 2023, no. 12, рр. 64.
  7. Cherepovitsyn A. Ye., Smirnova N. V., Il’inova A. A. Sovremennyy strategicheskiy analiz [Modern strategic analysis]. Saint-Petersburg, 2014, 204 p.
  8. Kurs MBA po strategicheskomu menedzhmentu [MBA course in strategic management]. Moscow, Al’pina Didzhital, 2007, 642 р.
  9. Tsygalov Y. M., Ordinartsev I. I. Metody vyyavleniya strategicheskikh al’ternativ razvitiya organizatsii [Methods for identifying strategic alternatives for the development of an organization]. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye [Management consulting], 2016, no. 4, pp. 176–185. (In Russ.).
  10. Baranovskiy V. Y., Garanin D. A., Lukashevich N. S. Formirovaniye i otsenka strategicheskikh al’ternativ razvitiya v promyshlennykh kompleksakh [Formation and evaluation of strategic development alternatives in industrial complexes]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskiye nauki [St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economic sciences], 2017, no. 1 (10), pp. 164– (In Russ.).
  11. Artyayeva M. A., Ponomarenko T. V. Vybor strategicheskikh al’ternativ pri formirovanii proizvodstvennogo potentsiala v gorno-metallurgicheskoy kompanii [The choice of strategic alternatives in the formation of production potential in a mining and metallurgical company]. Upravleniye ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal], 2019, no. 3 (121), pp. 24. (In Russ.).
  12. Islakayeva G. R. Ispol’zovaniye matritsy Bostonskoy konsaltingovoy gruppy v razrabotke strategiy razvitiya korporatsiy i gosudarstva [Using the matrix of the Boston Consulting Group in the development of strategies for the development of corporations and the state]. Vestnik UGNTU [Bulletin of USPTU], 2020, no. 3 (33), pp. 116–122. (in Russ).
  13. Teoriya i praktika strategicheskogo upravleniya ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Theory and practice of strategic management of economic systems]. Orel, 2021, 272 p
  14. Romanova O. V., Arylbayeva E. D. Formirovaniye korporativnoy korporativnoy strategii s primeneniyem matrits portfel’nogo analiza [Formation of a corporate strategy using portfolio analysis matrices]. Nauchnyy al’manakh [Scientific almanac], 2016, no. 5–1 (19), pp. 198– (In Russ.).
  15. Kozyubro T. I., Arutyunova A. A., Safronova Ya. M. Osnovnyye dostoinstva i nedostatki modeli strategicheskogo planirovaniya i upravleniya Igorya Ansoffa [The main advantages and disadvantages of Igor Ansoff’s strategic planning and management model]. Journal of Economy and Business, 2021, no. 4–1 (74), pp. 190– (In Russ.).
  16. Kalinina O. V., Maryukhta A. P. Algoritm ispol’zovaniya matritsy Ansoffa kak metod sistemnogo vybora neobkhodimoy strategii razvitiya kompanii [Algorithm for using the Ansoff matrix as a method of systematic selection of the necessary development strategy for the company]. Innovatsionnaya nauka [Innovative Science], 2015, no. 8, pp. 18– (In Russ.).
  17. Ansoff H. I. The New Corporate Strategy. NewYork, John Wiley & Sons, 1988. 262 p.
  18. Tompson-ml. A. A., Striklend A. Dzh. Strategicheskiy menedzhment: kontseptsii i situatsii dlya analiza [Strategic management: concepts and situations for analysis]. Moscow, Vil’yams, 2011, 928 p.
  19. Tekiyev M. V., Romanova N. G. Strategii razvitiya metallurgicheskogo predpriyatiya v zavisimosti ot etapa yego zhiznennogo tsikla [Strategies for the development of a metallurgical enterprise depending on the stage of its life cycle]. Vestnik magistratury [Bulletin of the Magistracy], 2016, vol. 3, no. 1 (52), pp. 51–53. (In Russ.).
  20. Zalyadnov V. Yu., Gavrishev S. Ye., Mikhaylova G. V., Kaderov S. S., Kovalenko N. V. Obosnovaniye strategii razvitiya gornodobyvayushchikh predpriyatiy na osnove analiza dokhodnosti i riska pri autsorsinge i diversifikatsii [Justification of the development strategy of mining enterprises based on the analysis of profitability and risk in outsourcing and diversification]. Gornaya promyshlennost’ [Mining industry], 2021, no. 4, рр. 134–139. doi:10.30686/1609-9192-2021-4-134-139. (In Russ.).
  21. Dmitriyeva D. M. Metodicheskiye osnovy strategicheskogo vybora krupnykh kaliynykh kompaniy [Methodological foundations of the strategic choice of large potash companies]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy internet-zhurnal [Russian Economic Internet Journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 5. (In Russ.).
  22. Stroykov G., Vasilev Y. N., Zhukov, O. V. Basic principles (Indicators) for assessing the technical and economic potential of developing arctic offshore oil and gas fields. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, no. 9 (12), рр. 1400.