DAIRY AND BEEF CATTLE BREEDING IN THE KOMI REPUBLIC: INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT ISSUES

Original article

Download article  

Irina S. Maltseva

Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North, Komi Science Centre, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia, maltseva@iespn.komisc.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7359-6720

 

Abstract. The study’s relevance stems from the increase in demand for livestock products, particularly meat, juxtaposed with the growing challenges in their production on an intensive scale. These challenges include environmental degradation, climate change, and an upswing in diseases linked to imbalanced nutrition. Also, there are ongoing discussions revolving around the merit of beef and milk with normalized fat content.

This study aimed to analyze the current state of dairy and beef cattle breeding in the North and formulate growth strategies aligned with the principles of sustainable development. Innovative approaches to cattle breeding have been explored, focusing on enhancing environmental, social, and economic efficiency in the industry. The “less and better” concept, centered on producing livestock products that cause minimal environmental harm, improve animal welfare, and benefit human health, has been thoroughly examined.

The study also discusses the challenges confronting cattle breeding in the Komi Republic. A shift towards intensive farming has been found to boost dairy cattle productivity while also resulting in increased cattle losses and a decline in fertility and overall health. Unresolved issues related to creating an optimal feed supply system and the uniform adoption of concentrate, hay, and silage feed mixtures also contribute to industry instability. Moreover, it has been found that concerns surrounding Holsteinization and the preservation of the Kholmogorsky breed of dairy cattle are particularly acute in the region. The study’s scientific novelty lies in introducing an integrated approach to cattle breeding in the Komi Republic, aiming to improve the quality of livestock products, enhance industry profitability, and boost farmland fertility. The practical significance of the study lies in proposing measures such as establishing cultivated pastures, reintroducing cattle grazing to improve the feed supply system, and safeguarding the Kholmogorsky breed. These proposals are valuable for governing bodies involved in shaping regional strategies and programs for agricultural production development.

Keywords: dairy and beef cattle breeding, northern region, integrated approach, feeding system, cultivated pastures, product quality, Kholmogorsky cattle

Acknowledgments: the study was carried out as part of the research project titled “Digital Bioeconomics in a Northern Region: Approaches and Directions”.

For citation: Maltseva I. S. Dairy and beef cattle breeding in the Komi Republic: Integrated management issues. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 1,  pp. 82–92. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.1.2024.83.006.

References

  1. Altuhov A. I., Strekozov N. I., Trafimov A. G., Chinarov V. I. Ratsional’noe razmeshchenie i uglublenie spetsializatsii molochnogo skotovodstva — osnovy ekonomiki ego razvitiya [Rational accommodation and deepening specialization of dairy cattle breeding – The basis of the economy of its development]. Vestnik Kurskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii [Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural University], 2019, no. 3, pp. 94–105. (In Russ.).
  2. Ternovykh K. S., Korobkov E. V. Myasnoi skot v Rossii: sostoyanie i orientiry [Meet cattle breeding in Russia: State and development guidelines]. Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal [Moscow Economic Journal], 2020, no. 2, pp. 231–238. (In Russ.).
  3. Amerkhanov Kh. A., Shekhovtsev G. S., Koldaeva E. M., Prokhorov I. P. Sokhranenie geneticheskogo raznoobraziya krupnogo rogatogo skota — osnova uspeshnogo razvitiya zhivotnovodstva [Preservation of the genetic diversity of cattle is the basis for the successful development of animal husbandry]. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo  [Dairy and beef cattle farming], 2023, no. 1, pp. 3–6. (In Russ.).
  4. Bailova N. V., Glinkina I. M., Aleksandrova M. S. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya otrasli molochnogo skotovodstva v Rossii [Status and development prospects of the dairy cattle industry]. Teoriya i praktika innovatsionnykh tekhnologii v APK. Materialy natsional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Theory and practice of innovative technologies in agriculture]. Voronezh, 2023, Ch. 2, pp. 5–12. (In Russ.).
  5. Kulintsev V. V., Surov A. I., Shevkhuzhev A. F. Myasnoe skotovodstvo Stavropol’skogo kraya [Beef cattle breeding in the Stavropol territory]. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo [Dairy and beef cattle farming], 2022, no. 2,  pp. 6–11. (In Russ.).
  6. Matyukov V. S., Zharikov Ya. A., Lobov D. V. Sokhranit’ kholmogorskuyu porodu — osnovu organicheskogo sel’skogo khozyaistva na Severe [Preserving the Kholmogorsky breed as a foundation of organic agriculture in the North]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Agrarian University], 2019, no. 55, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.).
  7. Mateescu Raluca G. Chapter 2 — Genetics and breeding of beef cattle. Animal Agriculture. Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations, 2020, pp. 21–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00002-1.
  8. Wahinya P. K., Jeyaruban M. G., Swan A. A., van der Werf J. H. J. Breeding objectives for dairy cattle under low, medium and high production systems in the tropics. Animal, 2022, vol. 16, is. 5, 100513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100513.
  9. Roche J. R., Berry D. P., Delaby L., Dillon P. G., Horan B., Macdonald K. A., Neal M. Review: New considerations to refine breeding objectives of dairy cows for increasing robustness and sustainability of grass-based milk production systems. Animal, 2018, vol. 12, sup. 2, pp. 350–362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002471.
  10. Greyerz K. von, Tidåker P., Karlsson J. O., Röös E. A large share of climate impacts of beef and dairy can be attributed to ecosystem services other than food production. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, vol. 325, part A, 116400. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116400.
  11. Tamásy C. Areas of intensive livestock agriculture as emerging alternative economic spaces? Applied Geography, 2013, vol. 45, pp. 385–391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.02.012.
  12. Rowntree J. E., Stanley P. L. , Maciel I. C. F., Thorbecke M., Rosenzweig S. T., Hancock D. W., Guzman A., Raven M. R. Ecosystem impacts and productive capacity of a multi-species pastured livestock system. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2020, vol. 4 (544984), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544984.
  13. Scialabba Nadia. E.-H. Managing Healthy Livestock Production and Consumption. Chapter 2 — Livestock food and human nutrition, 2022, pp. 29–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823019-0.00012-X.
  14. Poore J., Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 2018, vol. 360, no. 6392, pp. 987–992. Available at: DOI: https://10.1126/science.aaq0216.
  15. Springmann M., Godfray H. C. J., Rayner M., Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 4146–4151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113.
  16. Clark M. A., Springmann M., Hill J., Tilman D. Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, vol. 116 (46), pp. 23357–23362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906908116.
  17. Eating Better. 2020. What is better meat and dairy? Available at: https://www.eating-better.org/who-we-are/what-is-better-meat-and-dairy/.
  18. Schösler H., Boer J. D. Towards more sustainable diets: Insights from the food philosophies of “gourmets” and their relevance for policy strategies. Appetite, 2017–2018, vol. 127, pp. 59–68. Available at: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.022.
  19. Matyukov V. S., Zharikov Ya. A., Lobov D. V., Nikolaev S. V. Sostoyanie i perspektivy sokhraneniya genofonda skota kholmogorskoi porody [The state and prospects of preserving the gene pool of cattle of the Kholmogorsky breed]. Ekonomicheskie aspekty upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem agrarnogo sektora Rossii v regional’nykh aspektakh. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii v ramkakh III Respublikanskogo foruma, posvyashchennogo Dnyu Intellektual’noi sobstvennosti “Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ — budushchee Respubliki Komi” [Economic aspects of managing the innovation-driven development of the agricultural sector of Russia: Regional aspects]. Syktyvkar, 2019, pp. 174–187. (In Russ.).
  20. Zhao Y., Zhao H., Li L., Tan J., Wang Y., Liu M., Jiang L. Multi-omics analysis reveals that the metabolite profile of raw milk is associated with dairy cows’ health status. Food Chemistry, 2023, vol. 428, 136813. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136813.
  21. Boer J. D., Aiking H. Considering how farm animal welfare concerns may contribute to more sustainable diets. Appetite, 2022, vol. 168, 105786. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105786.
  22. Maltseva I. S. “Zelenaya” modernizatsiya sistemy zemledeliya severnogo regiona [The “green” modernization of the cropping system of the Northern region]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the market: Forming the economic order], 2018, no. 2, pp. 113–125. (In Russ.).
  23. Milknews. Novosti i analitika molochnogo rynka. Uchenye ustanovili, chto korovy na natural’nom vypase dayut bolee sbalansirovannoe moloko. 13 marta 2018. [News and analytics of the dairy market. Scientists have found that cows on natural grazing produce more balanced milk. March 13, 2018] (In Russ.) Available at: https://milknews.ru/longridy/uceniye-ustanovili-chto-korovi-na-naturalnom-vipase-dayut-bolee-sbalancirovannoye-moloko.html.
  24. Schwendel B. H., Wester T. J., Morel P. C. H., Fong B., Tavendale M. H., Deadman C., Shadbolt N. M., Otter D. E. Pasture feeding conventional cows removes differences between organic and conventionally produced milk. Food Chemistry, 2017, vol. 229, pp. 805–813. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.104.
  25. McGee M., Moloney A. P., O’Riordan E. G., Regan M., Lenehan C., Kelly A. K., Crosson P. Pasture-finishing of late-maturing bulls or steers in a suckler calf-to-beef system: Animal production, meat quality, economics, greenhouse gas emissions and human-edible food-feed efficiency. Agricultural Systems, 2023, vol. 209, 103672. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103672.
  26. Kutuzova A. A., Privalova K. N., Teberdiev D. M. Vozrodim kul’turnye pastbishcha. Rol’ kul’turnykh pastbishch v razvitii molochnogo skotovodstva Nechernozemnoi zony Rossii v sovremennykh usloviyakh [The role of cultivated pastures in the development of dairy cattle breeding in the Non-Chernozem zone of Russia in modern conditions]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov na osnove materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii po razvitiyu lugopastbishchnogo khozyaistva, posvyashchennoi 50-letiyu OAO “Mikhailovskoe” Yaroslavskoi oblasti [International research-to-practice conference on the development of grassland farming, dedicated to the 50th anniversary of Mikhailovskoye JSC, Yaroslavl Region]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 43–46. (In Russ.).
  27. Kutuzova A. A. Nauchnoe obespechenie lugovogo kormoproizvodstva Rossii [Scientific support of meadow fodder production in Russia]. Adaptivnoe kormoproizvodstvo [Adaptive fodder production], 2022, no. 3, pp. 14–24. (In Russ.).