CONCEPTUALIZING ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION IN THE CONTEXT OF ENSURING ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY IN THE ARCTIC

Original article

Download article 

Elena M. Klyuchnikova1, Vladimir A. Masloboev2, Vladimir V. Dyadik3, Andrey V. Masloboev4, Natalia V. Dyadik5, Anastasia N. Chapargina6

1,2,4–6Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

3Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

4Nanomaterials Research Centre of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

1e.klyuchnikova@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-6406-495X

2v.masloboev@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1536-921X

3v.dyadik@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-6004-9533

4a.masloboev@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1231-9225

5n.dyadik@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-3651-6976

6a.chapargina@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4399-4063

 

Abstract. The Arctic has become an area of heightened interest for many nations, with environmental issues in the region remaining a critical subject of discussion. Countries such as China, the EU, and the USA have expressed their interest  in shaping the environmental agenda in the Arctic. To prevent environmental conflicts and find mutually acceptable solutions, it is essential to study the distinctive features of the environmental policies adopted by these major global players. This article presents the results of a study aimed at identifying differences in the environmental security policies embedded in the current legislation of Russia, China, the USA, and the European Union. These entities declare their fundamental interests in the Arctic and position themselves as key players in the region, making it necessary for Russia to engage with them in various capacities. The study employs a comparative analysis of the environmental policies of the selected nations. A hierarchical framework was used for comparison, analyzing the content of environmental legislation in terms of concepts, objectives, policy directions, and implementation mechanisms. The novelty of the approach lies in its consideration of the socio-cultural factors underpinning the environmental concepts that shape each nation’s environmental policy. The study uncovered significant differences in the regulatory frameworks for environmental policy across Russia, China, the USA, and the EU, largely stemming from differences in worldviews and values. However, it also revealed substantial alignment in policy directions influenced  by the global environmental agenda. A key feature of Russia’s environmental policy is its emphasis on placing the individual at the center of environmental considerations, coupled with strict, scientifically grounded regulation of emissions  and pollutant discharges. The findings of this study can inform the development of a negotiation framework for the Russian Federation, incorporating environmental imperatives that reflect the unique characteristics of the Arctic. This framework  can support Russia’s efforts in fostering international cooperation in the region.

Keywords: environmental policy, environmental safety, legislation, socio-cultural features, Arctic.

Acknowledgments: This study was conducted under the research project 1021051803680-5 titled “Processes of transformation of natural and man-made systems in the context of climate change in Russia’s Arctic (on the territory  of the Murmansk region)”.

For citation: Klyuchnikova E. M., Masloboev V. A., Dyadik V. V., Masloboev A. V., Dyadik N. V., Chapargina A. N. Conceptualizing environmental policy: An analysis of Russian and international legislation in the context of ensuring environmental security in the Arctic. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 4, pp. 96–111. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.4.2024.86.007.

References

  1. Chumlyakov K. S., Chumlyakova D. V. Internatsionalizatsiya Arktiki i natsional’nye interesy arkticheskikh stran [Internationalization of the Arctic and national interests of the Arctic countries]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental research], 2023, no. 6, рр. 56–63. (In Russ.).
  2. Obydenkova A. Arctic environmental governance: challenges of sustainable development. Climatic Change, 2024, 177, рр. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03762-x.
  3. Dyadik V. V., Masloboev V. A., Klyuchnikova E. M., Dyadik N. V., Chapargina A. N., Masloboev A. V. Kontseptualizatsiya ekologicheskoi politiki: analiz rossiiskogo i zarubezhnogo nauchnogo diskursa i gosudarstvennye prioritety razvitiya Arktiki [Conceptualizing environmental policy: An analysis of Russian and international scientific discourse and national Arctic development priorities]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order] 2023, no. 1, р 7–34. (In Russ.).
  4. Shakleina T. A., Vodopyanov K. G., Yakovenko I. D. Fenomen “Upravlyaemoi global’noi konkurentsii” i interesy Rossii: novaya konkurentsiya v Arktike [The Phenomenon of “Managed Global Competition” and Russia’s Interests: New Competition in the Arctic Region]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek [Law and Management. XXI century], 2022, Vol. 18, 1 (62), рр. 17–29. (In Russ.).
  5. Wang Y. A blessing or a curse? China’s Arctic involvement and its environmental policy to prevent further climatic change and pollution. Climatic Change, 2023, 176, рр. 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03600-6.
  6. Wang Y., Ma Y. Costly Signaling and China’s Strategic Engagement in Arctic Regional Governance. Politics and Governance. Arctic Regional Governance: Actors and Transformations, 2024, Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7222.
  7. Fomenko G. A. Upravlenie prirodookhrannoi deyatel’nost’yu: osnovy sotsiokul’turnoi metodologii [Environmental management: Fundamentals of socio-cultural methodology]. Moscow, Nauka, 2004, 390 p.
  8. Arktika v tsifrakh [The Arctic in numbers], 2024, 87 p. Available at: https://minec.gov-murman.ru/activities/arktika-v-tsifrakh (accessed 11.02.2024).
  9. Greiz G. M., Kuzmenko Yu. G., Bose U. Kitaiskie interesy v rossiiskoi Arktike na fone zapadnykh sanktsii protiv Rossii i menyayushchegosya geopoliticheskogo global’nogo stsenariya [Chinese interests in the Russian Arctic against the backdrop of Western sanctions against Russia and the changing geopolitical global scenario]. Mir nauki i mysli [The World of Science and Thought], 2023, no. 1, рр. 134–138. (In Russ.).
  10. Hanson A. Ecological Civilization in the People’s Republic of China: Values, Action, and Future Needs. ADB East Asia Working Paper Series, 2019, no. 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS190604-2.
  11. Liu C., Chen L., Vanderbeck R. M., et al. A Chinese route to sustainability: Postsocialist transitions and the construction of ecological civilization. Sustainable Development, 2018, no. 26, рр. 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sd.1743.
  12. Anisimov A. P., Volkov I. K. Kontseptsiya ekologicheskoi tsivilizatsii Kitaya: predstavlyaet li ona interes dlya rossiiskogo prava? [The Concept of China’s Ecological Civilization: Is it of Interest to Russian Environmental Law?]. NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo [NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law], 2023, no. 48 (3), рр. 540–549. (In Russ.). DOI:10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-3-540–549.
  13. Wei Z., Hulin L., Xuebing A. Ecological Civilization Construction is the Fundamental Way to Develop Low-carbon Economy. Energy Procedia, 2011, no. 5, рр. 839–843.
  14. He J. Retrospect and Prospect of Ecological Civilization Construction in China. Advances in Engineering Research, 2018, no. 170, рр. 616–620.
  15. Liu, Chang Q. Ecological security research progress in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, Vоl. 35, Iss. 5, рp. 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.07.001.
  16. Liu Chen-Li, Wenlong Li, Jing Xu, Huakun Zhou, Changhui Li, Wenying Wang. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 2022, рр. 108734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108734.
  17. Ekologicheskoe zakonodatel’stvo KNR: sbornik zakonov i dokumentov [Environmental legislation of the PRC: A collection of laws and documents]. Moscow, Progress, 2018, 536 p.
  18. Efimov A. Yu. Prirodookhrannoe zakonodatel’stvo i osobennosti pravoprimenitel’noi praktiki v KNR posle XVIII s”ezda KPK [Environmental Legislation and Features of Law Enforcement Practice in the PRC after the 18th Congress of the Communist Party of China]. 70 let sovremennomu kitaiskomu gosudarstvu: materialy ezhegod. nauch. konf. tsentra politicheskikh issledovanii i prognozov IDV RAN (Moskva, 20–22 marta 2019 g.) [70 years of the modern Chinese state. Proceedings of the annual scientific conference of the Center for Political Research and Forecasts, IFES RAS. Moscow, March 20–22, 2019]. 2019, р 373–388.
  19. Xin M. Ekologicheskaya tsivilizatsiya i ee postroenie posredstvom prava v Kitae [Ecological civilization and its creation by law in China]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya [Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law]. 2018, nо. 5. pp. 130–136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.5.19.
  20. Kranina E. I., Liu X. Kitaiskaya model’ postroeniya “ekonomiki zamknutogo tsikla” [Chinese construction model “Сlosed cycle economy”]. Novye gorizonty ekonomiki KNR v 14-i pyatiletke (2021—2025 gg.) [New Horizons of the Chinese Economy in the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025)]. Moscow, ICCA RAS, 2022, рр. 9–26.
  21. Rovinskaya T. Ekologicheskaya politika v SShA kontsa ХХ — nachala ХХI v.: novye vyzovy [Environmental policy in the USA at the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century: New challenges]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 2018, Vol. 62, no. 7, р 72–82.  (In Russ.).
  22. Garusova L. N., Kuryanova U. Yu. Politika i zakonodatel’stvo SShA v ekologicheskoi sfere [US environmental policy and legislation]. Trudy Instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografii DVO RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019, 24, pp. 147–160. (In Russ.).
  23. Golichenkov A. K. Ekologicheskoe pravo: Prepodavanie i nauchnye issledovaniya [Environmental Law: Teaching and Research]. Ekologicheskoe pravo Rossii: sb. materialov nauch.-prakt. konf. [Environmental Law of Russia. Proceedings of the research-to-practice conference], 2003, no. 4, р 25–29.
  24. Davis Cross M. K., Riddervold M. ‘Reactive Power EU: Russian Aggression and the Development of an EU Arctic Policy’ 24. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2019, Iss. 1, pp. 43–60.
  25. Chuffart R., Raspotnik A., Stępień A. Our common arctic? A more sustainable EU-arctic nexus in light of the European green deal. The Polar Journal, 2021, 11 (2), рр. 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1978757.
  26. Shlyamina A. A. Ponyatie ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti v zakonodatel’stve Rossii i Finlyandii [The concept of environmental safety in the legislation of Russia and Finland]. Administrativnoe pravo i process [Administrative law and process], 2021, no. 12, р 63–66. (In Russ.).