TRENDS IN THE ECONOMIC FRAGMENTATION OF OLD INDUSTRIAL REGIONS  IN THE RUSSIAN NORTH AND ARCTIC: THE CASE OF THE KOMI REPUBLIC

Original article

Download article

Kseniya S. Goncharova1 Andrei G. Shelomentsev2, Endzela G. Amaglobeli3

1–3Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia

1ksenia.gon4arowa@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0003-2381-3322

2a.shelom@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-1904-9587

3eamaglobeli@gmail.com, ORCID 0009-0008-2682-2885

 

Abstract. The rational use of available economic space has become a critical challenge for the socio-economic development of the Russian North and Arctic. One of the key drivers of spatial imbalances has been the regional policies pursued since the early 1990s, which have led to the ongoing transformation of economic space, its “compression,” and subsequent fragmentation. In this study, fragmentation is understood as a pronounced differentiation in the levels of economic and social activity across the population. Today, negative economic and demographic trends in several old industrial regions  of the Russian North and Arctic—such as declining production in key industries, shrinking working-age populations, and sustained migration outflows—have further intensified spatial disparities. These dynamics have created divergent paths of socio-economic development between major industrial centers and peripheral regions. The objective of this study is  to identify the main trends in the transformation of the Komi Republic’s economic space over recent decades. The research employs a combination of methods, including territorial comparison, statistical analysis, ranking, and the classification and grouping of territories based on population size and density. The study yielded several key findings. First, the main stages of spatial development in the Komi Republic were identified, reflecting the scale and pace of natural resource exploitation: the onset of active development, fueling the growth of cities and urban-type settlements (1921–1950); the formation  of a network of industrial centers (1950–1990); a reduction in economic activity accompanied by socio-demographic decline (1990–present). Second, since the 1990s, there has been a steady population decline, particularly in small towns, driving further fragmentation of the economic space. Third, the growing concentration of the population in larger cities has resulted in an “island” pattern of territorial development, exacerbating disparities between developed industrial areas and peripheral zones. This process risks further degradation of the economic space and a weakening of territorial connectivity. Future research should focus on strategies to stabilize the population of the Komi Republic, including diversifying economic activity and fostering development in sparsely populated areas. The novelty of this study lies in identifying the stages  of spatial development in the Komi Republic, demonstrating how deepening fragmentation inevitably leads to spatial compression, and revealing the significant influence of socio-demographic factors on these processes in the old industrial regions of the Russian North and Arctic. The practical significance of this research lies in its applicability for developing forecasts, regional strategies, and national programs aimed at preserving populations in small towns, diversifying local economies, and attracting infrastructure investment in the Russian North and Arctic.

Keywords: fragmentation, socio-economic development, regional development, Russian Arctic, Komi Republic, population density, demographic trends, spatial structure

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 25-28-00512, https://rscf.ru/project/25-28-00512/.

For citation: Goncharova K. S., Shelomentsev A. G., Amaglobeli E. G. Trends in the economic fragmentation of old industrial regions in the Russian North and Arctic: The case of the Komi Republic. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 3, pp. 7–24. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.3.2025.89.001.

References

  1. Sorokina N. Y. Osobennosti staropromyshlennogo regiona kak ob”ekta upravleniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem [Features of the old-industrial region as an object of socio-economic development management]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences], 2016, no. 1–1, pp. 72–80. (In Russ).
  2. Styrov M. M., Gadzhiev Y. A., Akopov V. I. Osobennosti ispol’zovaniya finansovykh resursov promyshlennosti Respubliki Komi [Features of financial resource utilization in the industry of the Komi Republic]. Korporativnoe upravlenie i innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki Severa: Vestnik Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo tsentra korporativnogo prava, upravleniya i venchurnogo investirovaniya Syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Corporate Governance and Innovative Development of the North Economy: Bulletin of the Research Center of Corporate Law, Management and Venture Investment of Syktyvkar State University], 2009, no. 4. pp. 59. (In Russ).
  3. Tkachev S. A. Szhatie ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: ponyatie i podkhody [Economic space compression: The concept and approaches]. Evropeiskaya zona rossiiskoi Arktiki: stsenarii razvitiya: Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) [The European Zone of the Russian Arctic: Development scenarios. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference (with International Participation)]. Syktyvkar, Komi Republican Academy of Public Administration and Management, 2017, part 1, pp. 170–175. (In Russ).
  4. Friedmann J., Alonso W. Regional development and planning. A reader. Cambridge, Massachusetts, M.I.T. Press, 1964, 722 p.
  5. Friedmann J. Life Space and economic space: Contradictions in regional development. The Crises of the European Regions. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 1983, pp. 148–162. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-06588-2_9.
  6. Pivovarov Y. L. Al’ternativnaya kontseptsiya makroregional’nogo razvitiya Rossii: szhatie intensivno ispol’zuemogo prostranstva [An alternative concept of macro-regional development of Russia: Compression of intensively used space]. Mir Rossii [The World of Russia], 1996, no. 2, pp. 63–74. (In Russ).
  7. Treivish A. I. ″Szhatie″ prostranstva: traktovki i modeli [Space ″compression″: Interpretations and models]. Szhatie sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoe v teorii regional’nogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya: KhKhVII ezhegod. sessiya ekonomiko-geograficheskoi sektsii MARS [Compression of Socio-Economic Space: New Trends in the Theory of Regional Development and the Practice of Its Government Regulation: XXVII Annual Session of the Economic and Geographical Section of MARS]. Myshkin, Eslan, 2010, Vol. 27, pp. 16–31. (In Russ).
  8. Nefedova T. G., Treivish A. I., Sheludkov A. V. Polimasshtabnyi podkhod k vyyavleniyu prostranstvennogo neravenstva v Rossii kak stimula i tormoza razvitiya [Multi-scale approach to identifying spatial inequality in Russia as incentive and obstacle in development]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya [Bulletin of Russian Academy of Science. Geographical Series], 2022, Vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 289–309. doi:10.31857/S2587556622030128 (In Russ).
  9. Kryukov V. A., Kolomak E. A. Prostranstvennoe razvitie Rossii: osnovnye problemy i podkhody k ikh preodoleniyu [Spatial development of Russia: Main problems and approaches to their solution]. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Proceedings of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 2021, Vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 92–114. doi:10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-92-114 (In Russ).
  10. Volkova A. V. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov RF: dezintegratsiya i demograficheskoe szhatie [Socio-economic development of regions of the Russian Federation: Disintegration and demographic compression]. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie [Regional Economics and Management], 2023, no. 4 (76). (In Russ).
  11. Kirguyev A. T., Nechaev A. V. Chelovecheskii faktor v protsesse dezintegratsii na mezourovne [Human factor in the process of disintegration at the meso-level]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universitta. Seriya 5: Ekonomika [Bulletin of Adygeya State University. Series 5: Economics], 2012, no. 2, 22–26. (In Russ).
  12. Feyyaz M. Geopolitics, statehood, violence and space compression in Gilgit-Baltistan. South Asian History and Culture, 2019, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–45. doi:10.1080/19472498.2019.1576297.
  13. Teixeira V. M. de L., da Silva C. F., Pereira C. S. S. Social division of space and socio-spatial fragmentation in Mossoró/RN/Brazil. Mercator, Fortaleza, 2022, Vol. 21. doi:4215/RM2022.E21015.
  14. Petrov A. N. Redrawing the margin: Re-examining regional multichotomies and conditions of marginality in Canada, Russia and their northern frontiers. Regional Studies, 2012, Vol. 46, pp. 59–81. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.485180.
  15. Fedolyak V. S. Plotnost’ ekonomicheskogo prostranstva kak pokazatel’ effektivnogo ispol’zovaniya potentsiala territorii [Economic space density as a measure of territory potential’s effective use]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo [Bulletin of SGU. Economy. Management. Law], 2019, Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 122– doi:10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-2-122-127 (In Russ).
  16. Herzberg L. Ya., Budilova E. V. Problemy territorial’nogo planirovaniya i kachestvo sredy prozhivaniya [Problems of territorial planning and the quality of living environment]. Narodonaselenie [Population], 2015, no. 2, pp. 37-49. (In Russ).
  17. Lazhentsev V. N., Ivanov V. A. Strategiya sel’skogo razvitiya severnogo regiona [Rural development strategy of the northern region]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2020, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 696–711. doi:10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-2 (In Russ).
  18. Ioffe G., Nefedova T. Kvazi-tyunenovskii landshaft v regionakh Rossii [Quasi-tyunen landscape in Russian regions]. Rossiiskie regiony i tsentr: vzaimodeistvie v ekonomicheskom prostranstve [Russian regions and the center: Interaction in the economic space]. Moscow, Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2000, pp. 104–114. (In Russ).
  19. Camerin F., Gastaldi F. WASTELANDS. Recycling urban spaces for the shrinking city. Città, Territori, Progetti. 2023, Vol. 1, рp. 5–13. doi:10.36253/contest-14671.
  20. Marjanović M., Williams J. Mapping the emergence of the circular economy within the governance paths of shrinking cities and regions: A comparative study of Parkstad Limburg (NL) and Satakunta (FI). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, 2024, Vol. 17(3), pp. 517–534.
  21. Yu P., Chan E.H.W., Yung E.H.K., Wong M.S., Chen Y. Open space fragmentation in Hong Kong’s built-up area: An integrated approach based on spatial horizontal and vertical equity lenses. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023, vol. 102, pp. 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107174.
  22. Yu P., Zhang Y., Han M., Yung E.H.K., Chan E.H.W., Chen Y. Spatial heterogeneity impacts of urbanisation on open space fragmentation in Hong Kong’s built-up area. Land, 2024, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–19. doi:10.3390/land13040457.
  23. Wagtendonk A. J., Koomen E. An indicator set for capturing long-term open space fragmentation and urban development dynamics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2019, Vol. 76, pp. 178–193. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.04.007.
  24. Hou W., Zhang J., Peng Z., Walz U. Assessing habitat fragmentation in highly urbanized area: Implications for mitigating landscape dissection and habitat restoration. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, Vol. 139, pp. 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104557.
  25. Ntihinyurwa P. D., de Vries W. T. Farmland fragmentation concourse: Analysis of scenarios and research gaps. Land Use Policy, 2021, Vol. 100, pp. 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104936.
  26. Boussard J.-M. Les modèles économiques de l’espace géographique. La localisation des productions agricoles. Séance spécialisée du 20 mars 2002. Académie d’Agriculture de France (AAF). Paris, 2002, pp. 80–87. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-02764529 (accessed 19.05.2025).
  27. Olasehinde-Williams G., Köksal C. Geoeconomic fragmentation: What is at stake for energy transition in the Global North? Empirical evidence from panel-quantile-type estimation methods. Innovation and Green Development, 2025, Vol. 4, no. 2, Art. 100227, pp. 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2025.100227.
  28. Bosworth S., Snower D. The interplay of economic, social and political fragmentation. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/SSRN.3485484 (accessed 19.05.2025).
  29. Petrović J., Ateljević J. Neo-liberalism, depopulation and economic stagnation in the Balkans. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 2024, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 411–431. doi:10.1080/19448953.2024.2307806.
  30. Glinskiy V., Serga L., Novikov A., Litvintseva G., Bulkina A. Investigation of correlation between the regions sustainability and territorial differentiation. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, Vol. 8, pp. 323–329. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.041.
  31. Cherednichenko K. Modeling of territorial differentiation by transport infrastructure level of development. Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2020, no. 6, pp. 48–54. doi:10.46783/smart-scm/2021-6-4.
  32. Justman M. Fiscal competition and regional differentiation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2005, Vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 602–621. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.04.001.
  33. Cascio M. L., Bagarani M., Zampino S. Economic space trajectory through different regional growth models. Economics & Statistics Discussion Paper, 2008, no. 46/08, 15 p. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/73723204 (accessed 19.05.2025).
  34. Garcilazo E., McCann P. The case for place-based policy: Economic divergence, governance integrity and climate change mitigation. Regional Studies, 2025, pp. 1–14. doi:10.1080/00343404.2025.2485126.
  35. Krätke S. Regional integration or fragmentation? The German‐Polish border region in a new Europe. Regional Studies, 1999, Vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 631–641. doi:10.1080/00343409950078675.
  36. Blume L. Local economic policies as determinants of the local business climate: Empirical results from a cross-section analysis among East German municipalities. Regional Studies, 2006, Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 321–333. doi:10.1080/00343400600725178.
  37. Jonas A. E. G., While A. H., Gibbs D. C. Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces: The New territorial politics of collective provision. Regional Studies, 2009, Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 183–200. doi:10.1080/00343400802662666.
  38. Demyanenko A. N. Rossiiskoe ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo: dialektika protsessov integratsii i dezintegratsii [Russian economic space: Dialectics of integration and disintegration processes]. Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 2017, no. 2, pp. 5–10. (In Russ).
  39. Tsvetkov V. A., Zoidov K. H., Omarova Z. K. Sovershenstvovanie mekhanizmov regulirovaniya prostranstvennogo razvitiya kak vazhneishii vektor novogo kachestva ekonomicheskogo rosta territorii [Improvement of mechanisms for regulating spatial development as the most important vector of the new quality of economic growth of the territory]. Regional’nye problemy preobrazovanija ekonomiki [Regional Problems of Economic Transformation], 2012, no. 4, pp. 11–25. (In Russ).
  40. Portanova S. Rhythm in economic space. Transversal, 2018. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/37831038/Rhythm_in_Economic_Space (accessed 19.05.2025).
  41. Dmitrieva T. E. Potentsial prostranstvennogo razvitiya Severnogo regiona [Spatial development potential in a Northern region]. Aktual’nye problemy, napravleniya i mekhanizmy razvitiya proizvoditel’nykh sil Severa [Topical Issues, Directions, and Mechanisms of Developing the Productive Forces of the North]. The Fourth All-Russian Scientific Seminar (September 24–26, 2014, Syktyvkar): In 2 parts. Part II. Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North Komi Scientific Center of the Ural RAS Department, 2014, pp. 79–89. (In Russ).
  42. Fauzer V. V., Smirnov A. V., Fauzer G. N. Demograficheskaya otsenka ustoichivogo razvitiya malykh i srednikh gorodov rossiiskogo Severa [Demographic assessment of the sustainability of small and medium-sized cities in the Russian North]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2021, Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 552–569. doi:10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-14 (In Russ).
  43. Makeeva E. E. Istoriya administrativno-territorial’nogo deleniya Komi ASSR 1917–1990 gg. [A history of the administrative and territorial division of the Komi ASSR, 1917–1990]. Tsentral’nyi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Respubliki Komi: putevoditel’ [Central State Archive of the Komi Republic: A guidebook]. Syktyvkar, Komi Publishing House, 1992, 333 p.
  44. Savelyeva E.A. Istoriko-kul’turnyi atlas Respubliki Komi [A historical and cultural atlas of the Komi Republic]. Moscow, Drofa, DIK, 1997, 384 p.
  45. Burtseva I. G., Burtsev I. N. Sravnitelnaia otsenka ekonomicheskogo razvitiya maloosvoennykh territorii Respubliki Komi [A comparative assessment of the economic development of underdeveloped territories in the Komi Republic]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 2012, no. 4, pp. 153–162. (In Russ.).
  46. Pilyasov A. N., Galtseva N. V., Atamanova E. A. Ekonomika arkticheskikh″ostrovov″ (na primere Nenetskogo i Chukotskogo avtonomnykh okrugov) [Economy of the Arctic ″islands″: The case of Nenets and Chukotka Autonomous Okrugs]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2017, no. 13 (1), 114–125. (In Russ).
  47. Smirnov A. V. Demografiya rossiiskoi Arktiki v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Demography of the Russian Arctic in the digital age]. Moscow, Ekon-Inform, 2023, 239 p.
  48. Mkrtchyan N. V. Dinamika naseleniya Krainego Severa i Arktiki: analiz na osnove dannykh vserossiiskikh perepisei 2010 i 2020 gg. [Population dynamics of the Far North and the Arctic: Analysis based on data from the 2010 and 2020 All-Russian Censuses]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 2024, no. 35 (2), 226–236. doi:10.1134/S1075700724020102 (In Russ).
  49. Fauzer V. V. Demograficheskii potentsial severnykh regionov Rossii faktor i uslovie ekonomicheskogo osvoeniya Arktiki [Demographic potential of the northern regions of Russia as a factor and condition for the economic development of the Arctic]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2014, no. 4, 69–81. (In Russ).