THE IMPACT OF THE NATIONAL ARCTIC POLICY ON THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF RUSSIA’S POLAR REGIONS

Original article

Download article  

Tatiana P. Skufina1, Sergey V. Baranov1, Vera P. Samarina1, Aleksandr V. Samarin2

1Luzin Institute for Economic Studies, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

2Belgorod State National Research University, Stary Oskol branch, Stary Oskol, Russia

1ORCID 0000-0001-7382-3110, 2ORCID 0000-0002-1960-6120, 3ORCID 0000-0002-8901-5844, 4ORCID 0000-0002-7754-0246

Abstract. The article deals with the socio-economic dynamics of the Russian Arctic in the context of national policy and scientific views on the priorities, tasks, opportunities, and limitations of development. The fundamental importance and relevance of the presented research is determined by a series of fundamental problems that accompany the processes of development of the Russian Arctic, and the simultaneous increase in the importance of this territory for the national economy of Russia. The research methodology consists of three approaches: 1) critical generalization of policies, declarations, historical facts on development processes in the Arctic; 2) surveys of the population of the Arctic region of the Murmansk Oblast; 3) analysis of statistical data characterizing socio-economic processes in the Russian Arctic, including consideration of demographic indicators, identification of trends and dependencies of interaction between the main factors of GRP production (the number of employees, investment in fixed capital). The application of this interdisciplinary toolkit has made it possible to examine the manner in which socioeconomic transformations are taking place in the Russian Arctic. It has been established that policy is a determining factor in the development of the Russian Arctic. Long-term changes and contemporary socio-economic features of the development of the Russian Arctic are presented, and considered in close connection with the political attitudes, declarations, and views of scientists. It establishes the consistency of the legal regulation of the region with the priorities and declarations of the main participants of the processes in the Arctic. A positive influence of modern policy on the development of this area has been established, which has tended to reduce demographic losses and to ensure investment growth. At the same time, a number of disruptive aspects of development have been established: that there are significant labour and investment imbalances in some regions of the Russian Arctic; and that there is a strong migratory mood among the most economically active population. These findings not only highlight the lack of theoretical development in the field of effective policymaking, but also identify an area for further research. They have important practical implications for identifying and neutralizing risks to the sustainable development of the Russian Arctic.

Keywords: the Arctic, socio-economic transformations, national Arctic policy

Acknowledgments: the published work incorporates the results of the Federal Research Center “Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences” performing state task No. АААА-А18-118051590118-0 (policies and socio-economic transformations in the Russian Arctic) and grant from the Russian Science Foundation No. 19-18-00025 (analysis of the gross regional product of the Russian Arctic regions).

For citation: Skufina T. P., Baranov S. V., Samarina V. P., Samarin A. V. The impact of the national Arctic policy on the socio-economic transformations of Russia’s Polar regions. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2022, no. 2, pp. 69–81. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2022.76.006

References

  1. Bertelsen R. G., Gallucci V. The Return of China, Post-Cold War Russia and the Arctic: Changes on Land and at Sea. Marine Pol. Vol. 72. P. 240–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.034
  2. Healy A. Innovation in Circumpolar Regions: New Challenges for Smart Specialization. The North. Rev. 2017. No. 45. P. 11—32. DOI: 10.22584/nr45.2017.002
  3. Flake L E., 2014. Russia’s Security Intentions in a Melting Arctic. Military and Strat. Affair. 2014. Vol. 6. P. 99–116.
  4. Korchak E. A., Serova N. A., Emelyanova E. E., Yakovchuk A. A. Human capital of the Arctic: problems and development prospects. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 302. P. 012078. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012078
  5. Markkula I, Turunen M., Rasmus S. A review of climate change impacts on the ecosystem services in the Saami Homeland in Finland. of The Total Environ. 2019. Vol. 692. P. 1070–1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.272
  6. O’Garra T. Economic value of ecosystem services, minerals, and oil in a melting Arctic: A preliminary assessment. Services. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 180–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.024
  7. Kudryashova E. V., Zarubina L. A., Sivobrova I. A. Cross-border investment cooperation in the Arctic Region: challenges and opportunities. and Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forec. 2019. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 39–52. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.2
  8. Padrtovaab B., 2019. Frozen narratives: How media present security in the Arctic. Polar Scien. 2019. Vol. 21. 37–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2019.05.006
  9. Brosnan J. G., Leschine T. M., Miles E. L. Cooperation or Conflict in a Changing Arctic? Ocean Devel. & Intern. Law. 2011. No. 42. P. 173–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2011.543032
  10. Heininen L. Arctic strategies and policies: Inventory and comparative study. Akureyri & Rovaniemi: The Northern Research Forum & University of Lapland. 2011. 95 p.
  11. Heininen L., Everett K., Padrtova B., Reissell A. Arctic Policies and Strategies-Analysis, Synthesis, and Trends. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria. 2019. 264 p. DOI: 10.22022/AFI/11-2019.16175
  12. Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Arctic policies and strategies –– analysis, synthesis, and trends, Polar Geography. 2020. Vol. 43, no. 2–3. P. 240–242. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2020.1766593
  13. Korchak E., Serova N. High-quality reproduction of labor potential of Arctic territories: migration factor. The Europ. Proc. of Social & Behav. Scien EpSBS. 2019. Vol. LXXVI. P. 1736–1742. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.235
  14. Caceres D. 2019. European cooperation: How important country is Poland to ensure the Arctic governance? Polar Scien. V 21. P. 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.10.007
  15. Tabata S., Otsuka N., Goto M., Takahashi M., 2021. Economy, society and governance in the Arctic: Overview of ArCS research project in the field of humanities and social sciences (2015–2020). Polar Science. Vol. 27. P. 100600. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2020.100600
  16. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V., Larchenko L. The Russian Arctic: Strategic management and socio-economic transformation. of Strateg. Manag. Journ. 2021. Vol. 21, no. 5. P. 1–8.
  17. Vinogradova V., Titkova T., Zolotokrylin A. How climate change is affecting the transitional natural zones of the Northern and Arctic regions of Russia. Polar Science. 2021. Vol. 29. P. 100652. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2021.100652
  18. Samarina V. P., Skufina T. P., Savon D. Y., Shinkevich A. I. Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone. Sustainabil. 2021. Vol. 13, no. P. 7749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147749
  19. Andreeva E. N., 1998. The Russian Arctic coastal zone management problems: past lessons and new realities. Ocean & Coastal Management. Vol. 41, no 2–3. P. 237–256.
  20. McCannon J., 1998. Red Arctic: Polar Exploration and the Myth of the North in the Soviet Union, 1932–1939. Oxford University Press, Great Britan. 256 p.
  21. Nilsson A. E., Larsen J. N., 2020. Making Regional Sense of Global Sustainable Development Indicators for the Arctic. Sustainabil. 2020. Vol. 12, no 3. P. 1027. DOI:10.3390/su12031027
  22. Leksin V. N., Porfiryev B. N. Redevelopment of the Russian Arctic region as a subject of system study and state program- and target-oriented management: issues of methodology. Recon. 2015. Vol. 1 (4). 515–524. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2015.4.015
  23. Korchak E. A. Pandemija COVID-19 v rossijskoj Arktike: nekotorye social’no-jekonomicheskie itogi 2020 g. [The COVID-19 pandemic in the Russian Arctic: some socio-economic results of 2020]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika [Arctic: Ecol. and Econ.], 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 353–361. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25283/2223- 4594-2021-3-353-361
  24. Heininen L. Overview of Arctic Policies and Strategies. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and Nor.], 2020, no. 39, pp. 195–202. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.39.195
  25. Pavlov, K., Selin, V. The industry of Russia’s Northern Regions after anti-Russian sanctions. Scien. 2018. Vol. 3 (49). P. 57–68.
  26. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V. Modeling the Production of GRP Regions of the North of Russia. In: Solovev D. (eds) Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production. FarEastСon 2018. Smart Innov., Syst. and Technologies. Vol. 139. P. 173–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18553-4_22
  27. Baranov S. V., Skuf’ina T. P., Gushchina I. A. The Impact of the Retirement Age Increase on the Economy and Attitudes of the Population of the Murmansk Oblast. and Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forec. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 1. P. 160–173. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.9
  28. Khoreva O., Konchakov R., Leonard C. S., Tamitskiy A., Zaikov K. S., 2018. Attracting skilled labour to the North: Migration loss and policy implications across Russia’s diverse Arctic regions. Polar Rec. 2018. Vol. 54 (5–6). 324–328.
  29. Emelyanova E. E., Chapargina A. N. Assessing the regional housing market development in the Northern and Arctic regions of the Russian Federation. and Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forec. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 5. P. 105–120. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.6
  30. Davydova M. L., Epifanov A. Y., Sharno O. I., Vanicheva M. N. Legal and Institutional Frameworks for the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Scien. Vol. 302. P. 012010. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012010
  31. Medico B. D., 2020. Tsunami Coronavirus. When Will We Go Back to Normal? Sabaudia: Bruno Del Medico Editore, Italy. 156 p.
  32. Arrow K. J., Chenery B. H., Minhas B. S., Solow R. M. Capital-labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Rev. of Econ. and Statis. 1961. Vol. 43, no. 3. P. 225–250.
  33. Kroese D. P., Chan J. C. C. Statistical Modeling and Computation. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, US. 2014. 400 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8775-3
  34. Fedorov V. P., Zhuravel V. P., Grinyaev S. N., Medvedev D. A. Scientific approaches to defining the territorial boundaries of the Arctic. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Scien. 2019. Vol. 302, no. 1. P. 012012. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012012
  35. Östhagen A. High North, Low Politics-Maritime Cooperation with Russia in the Arctic. Arctic Rev. on Law and Polit. 2016. Vol. 7, no 1. P. 83–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.255
  36. Biedermann R. Adapting to the changing Arctic? The European Union, the Nordics, and the Barents Governance Mosaic. of Contemporary Europ. Stud. 2020. Vol. 28, no 2. P. 167–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2019.1693352
  37. Biresselioglua M. E., Demirb M. H., Solaka B., Kayacanc A., Altincia S. Investigating the trends in arctic research: The increasing role of social sciences and humanities. of The Total Environ. 2020. Vol. 729, no. 10. P. 139027. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139027
  38. Larchenko L. V. Restructuring of the economy of resource-extracting regions of the Russian North and the Arctic as a necessary condition for sustainable territorial development. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Scien. 2021. Vol. 678, no. 1. P. 012018.
  39. Brutschin E., Schubert S. Icy waters, hot tempers, and high stakes: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics of the Arctic. Energy Res. & Social Scien. 2016. Vol. 16. P. 147–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.020
  40. Biev A. A., Serova N. A. Features of the organization of fuel supplies to the Arctic regions of Russia: assessment of transport conditions. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Scien. 2020. Vol. 539, no. 1. P. 012017. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/539/1/012017