DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT FOR THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAR NORTH REGIONS ON THE BASIS OF FORMULATION OF A SYSTEM OF BALANCED INDICATORS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES

Original article

 Download article 

Anna B. Teslya1, Irina M. Zaychenko2, Zarema M. Hasheva3

1, 2Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

3Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russia

1anntes@list.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8395-6515

2zaychenko@spbstu.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4516-7088

3zarema_muratovna@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-5354-4464

Abstract. The article substantiates the need to revise the approach to developing a strategy for the socio-economic development of the regions of the Far North in order to ensure their sustainable development in the current conditions of digital transformation
of the economy. The implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept requires the use of updated, adjusted methods and tools for building modern programs for the strategic development of both enterprises, industries, complexes, and regions. The adjustment of strategic management systems should take place, first of all, on the parameters of digitalization, since the timely introduction of information and communication technologies into management processes is not just a modern trend, but a necessary condition for creating and maintaining competitive advantages. Therefore, the development of a modified system of strategic management of the regions, of course, should include the conditions, opportunities and results of the application of actual and relevant information and communication technologies, as well as take into account possible risks and barriers to their implementation. Despite the different geopolitical significance of the regions, diffrent socio-economic indicators of development, climatic and sectoral features, the approach to developing the concept of socio-economic development of territories can be interpreted as universal at the conceptual level of building a common strategic map. As a tool for developing a strategy for sustainable development of the regions, a balanced scorecard was chosen, the main advantage of which is a balanced combination of both financial and non-financial indicators of the socio-economic activities of the regions. Thus, the result of the study was the development of a modified general strategic map of the balanced scorecard of the regions, the main difference of which from the existing ones lies in the possibility of taking into account the impact of the indicators of the digital transformation of the main socio-economic phenomena and processes at the regional level. The modification of the balanced scorecard consists in the formulation of a new component “digital transformation and digital security”.

Keywords: balanced scorecard, digital transformation, stakeholders, sustainable socio-economic services, regional economy

For citation: Teslya A. B., Zaychenko I. M., Hasheva Z. M. Development of the concept for the strategic development of the Far North regions on the basis of formulation of a system of balanced indicators under the conditions of digital transformation of socio-economic processes. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2022, no. 2, pp. 58–68. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2022.76.005

References

  1. Skobelev D. O., Fedoseev S. V. Ustojchivoe razvitie i povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennosti v Barencevom Evro-Arkticheskom regione [Sustainable development and industrial enterprises competitiveness increasing in the Barents Euro-Arctic region]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie jekonomicheskogo porjadka [The North and the Market: Forming  the Economic Order], 2021, no. 2, pp. 7–19. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.2.2021.72.001. (In Russ.).
  2. Agarkov S. A. i dr. Osnovnye napravlenija povyshenija jeffektivnosti hozjajstvennoj dejatel’nosti v Arkticheskoj zone Rossijskoj Federacii [The main directions of improving the efficiency of economic activity in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. Zapiski Gornogo instituta [Notes of the Mining Institute], 2018, vol. 230, pp. 209–216. (In Russ.).
  3. Kozlov A. V. i dr. Kompleksnoe razvitie jekonomicheskogo prostranstva Arkticheskoj zony Rossijskoj Federacii [Comprehensive development of the economic space of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. Saint Petersburg, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 2016, 315 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Fadeev A. M., Cherepovicyn A. E., Larichkin F. D. Strategicheskoe upravlenie neftegazovym kompleksom v Arktike [Strategic management of the oil and gas complex in the Arctic]. Apatity, KNC RAN, 2019, 289 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Kaplan R., Norton D. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Press School, 2004, 324 p.
  6. Antohonova I. V. Konceptual’nye podhody k ispol’zovaniju SSP na urovne regiona [Conceptual approaches to the use of SSPs at the regional level]. Rossija: tendencii i perspektivy razvitija [Russia: trends and prospects of development], 2019, no. 14–1, pp. 739–741. (In Russ.).
  7. Zav’jalova V. V., Norkina A. N., Najdenkova K. V. Sistema sbalansirovannyh pokazatelej jeffektivnosti (SSP) kak ocenka i instrument v upravlenii regionom i ego razvitii [Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as the evolution and the tool in management  in development of the region]. Sovremennaja nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Serija: Jekonomika i pravo  [Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Economics and Law], 2014, no. 1–2, pp. 23–25. (In Russ.).
  8. Merzlikina G. S., Kuzmin E. V. Sbalansirovannaja sistema pokazatelej ocenki jeffektivnosti dejatel’nosti klastera [Balanced system of indicators for estimating cluster performance]. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Jekonomicheskie nauki [St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics], 2018, vol. 11, no. 5. DOI: 10.18721/JE.11511. (In Russ.).
  9. Utkin A. I., Shitik E. V. Stimulirovanie innovacionnogo razvitija dohodnogo potenciala regional’nyh bjudzhetov na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Stimulation of innovative development of the income potential of regional budgets based on the balanced scorecard]. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Jekonomika [Ivanovo State University Bulletin. Series: Economy], 2019, no. 4, pp. 43–49. (In Russ.).
  10. Mjakshin V. N. Postroenie rejtingov investicionnoj privlekatel’nosti regionov na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Building ratings of investment attractiveness of regions based on a balanced system of indicators]. Finansovo-jekonomicheskoe i informacionnoe obespechenie innovacionnogo razvitija regiona [Financial, economic and information support of innovative development of the region], 2020, pp. 261–265. (In Russ.).
  11. Tihanova D. V., Mjakshin V. N. Ocenka migracionnoj privlekatel’nosti Arhangel’skoj oblasti na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Assessment of Migration Attractiveness of Arkhangelsk Region Based on a Balanced Scorecard]. Vestnik Juzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Jekonomika i menedzhment [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management], 2021, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 43–49. DOI: 10.14529/em210205. (In Russ.).
  12. Utkin A. I. Sbalansirovannaja sistema pokazatelej ocenki dohodnogo potenciala regional’nyh bjudzhetov [Balanced system of indicators for assessing the revenue potential of regional budgets]. Nauka, obrazovanie i kul’tura [Science, education and culture], 2020, pp. 205–212. (In Russ.).
  13. Barkenhoeva R. A. Realizacija dinamicheskogo podhoda k ocenke urovnja i kachestva zhizni naselenija na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Implementation of a dynamic approach to assessment of the level and quality of life of the population based on the Balanced system of indicator]. Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 5: Jekonomika [Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 5: Economics], 2019, no. 2 (240), pp. 15–23. (In Russ.).
  14. Utkin A. I., Marincev D. A. Upravlenie jekonomicheskimi riskami innovacionnogo razvitija regional’nyh bjudzhetov na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Economic Risk-Management of Innovative Development of Regional Budgets Based on the Balanced Scorecard]. Jekonomika i biznes: teorija i praktika [Economics and Business: theory and practice], 2019, no. 11–3, pp. 98–106. DOI: 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11402. (In Russ.).
  15. Blinova E. A., Esipova O. V. Matematicheskij analiz dostizhenija strategicheskih celej regiona s pomoshh’ju sistemy sbalansirovannyh pokazatelej [Mathematical analysis of the achievement of strategic goals of the region using a system of balanced indicators]. Fundamental’nye issledovanija [Basic research], 2018, no. 6, pp. 62–66. (In Russ.).
  16. Korchagina I. V., Rogova K. V. Strategija formirovanija innovacionnoj jekosistemy tehnologicheskogo predprinimatel’stva regiona na osnove sistemy sbalansirovannyh pokazatelej [Strategy for creating an innovative ecosystem of technological entrepreneurship in the region based on a system of balanced indicators]. Voprosy upravlenija [Management issues], 2020, no. 1 (62), pp. 93–107. (In Russ.).
  17. Tihanova D. V. Metodologija ocenki migracionnoj privlekatel’nosti sub#ektov Arkticheskoj zony Rossijskoj Federacii na osnove sbalansirovannoj sistemy pokazatelej [Methodology for assessing the migration attractiveness of the subjects of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation on the basis of a balanced system of indicators]. Finansovo-jekonomicheskoe i informacionnoe obespechenie innovacionnogo razvitija regiona [Financial, economic and information support of innovative development of the region], 2021, pp. 273–277. (In Russ.).
  18. Gutman S. S., Rytova E. V. Kompleks regional’nyh indikatorov ustojchivogo razvitija rajonov Krajnego Severa [Complex of regional indicators of sustainable development of the Far North Region]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie jekonomicheskogo porjadka [North and the market: the formation of an economic order], 2018, no. 1, pp. 19–31. DOI: 10.25702/KSC.2220-802X-1-2018-57-19-31. (In Russ.).
  19. Marcela K., Michaela S., Ondrej S. Dynamic balanced scorecard: model for sustainable regional development // WSEAS transactions on environment and development, 2011, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 211–221.
  20. Teklehaimanot H. D. et al. Use of balanced scorecard methodology for performance measurement of the health extension program in Ethiopia. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 11–57.
  21. Weir E. et al. Applying the balanced scorecard to local public health performance measurement: deliberations and decisions. BMC public health, 2009, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
  22. Sepetis A. et al. The Implementation of Voluntary Environmental Agreements and Sustainable Balanced Scorecard in the Health Care Region of Greece. Int. J. Biol. Biomed, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 1–10.
  23. Mustafa M. M. A., Wali A. I. The Role of Applying the Balanced Scorecard in Evaluating Strategic Performance: An Analytical Study of The Opinions of a Sample of Depeartment Heads in A Number of Private Universities in The City of Erbil, Kurdistan Region-Iraq. QALAAI ZANIST SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 580–614.
  24. Gutman S., Teslya A. Environmental safety as an element of single-industry towns’ sustainable development in the Arctic region. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing, 2018, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 012010.
  25. Ţiţan E. et al. From traditional to digital: the labour market demands and education expectations in an EU context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, vol. 10, pp. 269–274. Pouliakas K. The great divide: digitalisation and digital skill gaps in the EU workforce, 2017. Available at: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/statistics-and-indicators/statistics-and-graphs/esjsurvey-insights-no-9 (accessed: 08.03.2022).
  26. Fitzgerald B. K. et al. Lessons from the Great Recession: A digital recovery rewards digital skills in emerging fields. Industry and Higher Education, 2018, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57–61.
  27. Zajchenko I. M. i dr. Strategicheskoe upravlenie razvitiem predprijatij toplivno-jenergeticheskogo kompleksa v Arkticheskom regione Rossijskoj Federacii v uslovijah Industry 4.0 [Strategic management of the development of fuel and energy complex enterprises in the arctic region of the Russian Federation in the conditions of Industry 4.0]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie jekonomicheskogo porjadka [North and the market: the formation of an economic order], 2021, no. 2, pp. 69–80. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.2.2021.72.006. (In Russ.).
  28. Nahusheva Z. A., Ashinova I. V., Alikaeva M. V. Postroenie funkcii vlijanie cifrovogo udara na social’no-jekonomicheskuju jekosistemu regiona [Construction of the digital impact function on the socio-economic ecosystem of the region]. Izvestija Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN [Proceedings of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2021, no. 6 (104), pp. 214–221. (In Russ.).
  29. Gorlov K. N., Il’icheva M. V. Cifrovizacija kak osnova ustojchivogo razvitija regiona: social’no-politicheskij i jekonomicheskij aspekty [Digital transformation as a basis for sustainable development of the region: social, political and economic aspects]. Izvestija Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Tula State University Bulletin. Humanitarian sciences], 2018, no. 4. (In Russ.).
  30. Nikolaev M. A., Mahotaeva M. Ju., Gusarova V. N. Analiz vlijanija processov cifrovizacii na jekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov [Analysis of the influence of digitalization processes on regions’ economic development]. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Jekonomicheskie nauki [St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics], 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 46–56. DOI: 1018721/JE.13404. (In Russ.).
  31. Vlasov M. V. Cifrovaja jekonomika kak osnovnoe napravlenie povyshenija urovnja jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti regiona (na primere sub’ektov Central’nogo federal’nogo okruga RF) [Digital economy as the main direction of increasing the region’s economic security level (a case of the Central Federal District Subjects)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Jekonomika [Perm University Bulletin. Series: Economy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 271–287. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-2-271-287. (In Russ.).
  32. Soshina O. N. Osnovnye problemy obespechenija urovnja jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti regiona v cifrovoj jekonomike [The main problems of ensuring the level of economic security of the region in the digital economy]. Informatika [Economics. Information technologies], 2020, vol. 47, no. 1. pp. 31–39. (In Russ.).
  33. Zemcov S., Barinova V., Semjonova R. Riski cifrovizacii i adaptacija regional’nyh rynkov truda v Rossii [The Risks of Digitalization and the Adaptation of Regional Labor Markets in Russia]. Forsajt [Foresight and STI Governance], 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 84–96. (In Russ.).
  34. Bezdelov S. A. Finansovaja cifrovizacija dlja stimulirovanija regional’nogo razvitija i smjagchenija sankcionnyh riskov [Financial digitalization for the stimulation of regional development and the neutralization of sanctions risks]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2019, no. 2, pp. 129–140. (In Russ.).
  35. Vasilenko L. A., Zotov V. V. Cifrovizacija publichnogo upravlenija v Rossii: riski, kazusy, problemy [Digitalization of public administration in Russia: risks, casuses, problems]. Cifrovaja sociologija [Digital sociology], 2020, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 4–16. DOI: 10.26425/2658-347X-2020-2-4-16. (In Russ.).
  36. Kruk M. N., Nikulina A. Y., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Semenov A. S. Environmental and economic damage from the development of oil and gas fields in the Arctic shelf of the Russian Federation. European Research Studies Journal, 2018, vol. 2, no. 21, pp. 423–433. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1269
  37. Fadeev A. M., Cherepovicyn A. E., Larichkin F. D., Fedoseev S. V. Ocenka prioritetnosti razrabotki mestorozhdenij rossijskoj Arktiki kak instrument jeffektivnogo prirodopol’zovanija v sovremennyh makrojekonomicheskih uslovijah [Assessment of the priority of the development of deposits in the Russian Arctic as a tool for effective environmental management in modern macroeconomic conditions]. Jenergeticheskaja politika [Energy Policy], 2018, no. 4, pp. 34–48. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36523893 (accessed: 17.02.2022).
  38. Harris A. COVID-19–school leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2020.
  39. Dwivedi Y. K. et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, vol. 55, pp. 10–22.
  40. Digital infrastructure as the factor of economic and industrial development: Case of Arctic regions of Russian North-West. Kozlov A., Kankovskaya A., Teslya A. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 539 (1), 012061.