THE DOMINANT EMPLOYER’S STRATEGY AS A FACTOR IN DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCIES AMONG THE POPULATION OF AN ARCTIC MONOTOWN

Original article

Download article   

Vladimir V. Dyadik1, Aleksei V. Igumnov2, Alina R. Kankovskaya3, Anna B. Teslya4

1, 2Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Science, Apatity, Russia

3, 4Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

1v.dyadik@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-6004-9533

2avigumnov75@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-9317-2228

3 kankovskaya_ar@spbstu.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-9317-2228

4anntes@list.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8395-6515

Abstract. This article examines the challenges in shaping and developing digital competencies among the population during the transition to a digital economy, using the dominant employer in an Arctic monotown as a case study. The impact of digital technologies on the socio-economic aspects of territorial development has not been thoroughly studied, and the development of digital competencies in the population of monotowns remains underexplored and requires further research. The authors highlight the importance of addressing the development of digital competencies among employees and the digital culture of dominant employers, considering regional factors crucial for formulating development strategies for both individual companies and territories (monotowns). The goal of this study is to assess the readiness of executives, managers, and specialists at the dominant company in an Arctic monotown to implement digital processes. The key objectives are  to identify and classify the preferences of these executives, managers, and specialists regarding the current level of business digitalization. Our review of studies on the topic confirmed the variation in the development of regional digital infrastructure, influenced by regional development characteristics, the specific labor resources in monotowns, and the impact of dominant employers on digital competency development. To conduct the study, a questionnaire was developed to identify the preferences of senior and middle managers at the company. Electronic document management was chosen as the focus area, as digitalization often begins with this process, leading to varied assessments by employees, including instances  of opportunism. Our analysis of the responses revealed a moderate relationship between work experience and preference for electronic document management, as well as a correlation between work experience and the willingness to improve specialized competencies. There was a high overall recognition of the need for continuous development and training.  The results identified key areas for digital competency development among the company’s staff.

Keywords: monotown, dominant employer, strategy, Arctic, digital competencies, digital environment, barriers, communications

For citation: Dyadik V. V., Igumnov A. V., Kankovskaya A. R., Teslya A. B. The dominant employer’s strategy as a factor  in developing digital competencies among the population of an Arctic monotown. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 2, pp. 46–57. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2024.84.004.

References

  1. Nakhusheva Z. A., Ashinova I. V., Alikaeva M. V. Postroenie funktsii vliyanie tsifrovogo udara na sotsial’no-ekonomicheskuyu ekosistemu regiona [Construction of function of influence of digital impact on socio-economic ecosystem of the region]. Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2021, No 6 (104), pp. 214–221. (In Russ.).
  2. Gere C. Tsifrovaya kontrkul’tura [Digital culture]. Gumanitarnaya informatika [Computer science in humanities], 2004, No 1, pp. 50–71. (In Russ.).
  3. Harper V. The digital divide (DD): A reconceptualization for educators. AACE Journal 1 (2003): 96–103.0, 12.
  4. Scheerder A., van Deursen A., Dijk J. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, Vol, 34, Issue 8, December 2017, pp. 1607–1624 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
  5. González M. C., Martín S. C. Social educators: A study of digital competence from a gender differences perspective. Croatian Journal of Education, 2018, Vol 20, No 1, 11–42.
  6. Vázquez-Cano E., Meneses E. L., García-Garzón E. Differences in basic digital competences between male and female university students of Social Sciences in Spain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2017, No 14 (2).
  7. Mossberger K., Tolbert C. J., McNeal R. S. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2007.
  8. Harper V. The digital divide (DD): A reconceptualization for educators. AACE Journal, 2003, No 11 (1), pp. 96.
  9. Scheerder A et al. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 2017, No 34 (8). pp. 1607.
  10. Fernandez-Pascual R. Communication of information in the digital age among social sciences students: Uncovering a synthetic indicator of performance. Journal of Information Management, 2018, No 70 (4), pp. 326.
  11. Graham S et al. Towards a study of information geographies: (im)mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information. Geo: Geography and Environment, 2015, No. 2 (1), pp. 88.
  12. Haffner J. Critical infrastructures, critical geographies: Towards a spatial theory of the digital divide. Chapter in the book: Theorizing Digital Divides, pp. 103.
  13. Volkova N. N., Romanyuk E. I. Razvitie tsifrovoi sredy rossiiskikh regionov [Development of the digital environment of Russian regions]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of territory’s development], 2019, No 5 (103), pp. 38–52. (In Russ.).
  14. Oborin M. S. Tsifrovaya sreda kak faktor povysheniya bezopasnosti regiona [Digital environment as a factor in increasing the economic security of the region]. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni VI Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bulletin of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Economics and Management], 2021, No 7 (2), pp. 83–91. (In Russ.).
  15. Cruz-Jesus F. et al. The education-related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, No 56, pp. 72.
  16. Kozlov A., Kankovskaya A., Teslya A. Digital infrastructure as the factor of economic and industrial development: case of Arctic regions of Russian North-West. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2020, No 539 (1), pp. 012061.
  17. Savvinov Yu. A., Kornilova A. G. Razvitie tsifrovykh kompetentsii u obuchayushchikhsya v arkticheskikh shkolakh [Development of digital competencies among students in Arctic schools]. Effektivnye praktiki proforientatsionnoi raboty v obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiyakh [Effective practices of career guidance in educational organizations], 2023, pp. 180–185. (In Russ.).
  18. Nechaeva L. A. Vozmozhnosti elektronnogo obucheniya v formirovanii mezhkul’turnoi kompetentsii: opyt raboty arkticheskogo universiteta (Norvegiya, Tromse) [E-learning as a factor in the development of intercultural competence: A case study of a university in the Arctic (Norway, Tromsø)]. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek [Lifelong learning: XXI century], 2014, No 2 (6), pp. 123–133. (In Russ.).
  19. Gradusova V. N. Lipatova L. N., Strokan E. V. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na tsifrovizaciyu ekonomiki arkticheskikh regionov Rossii [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digitalization of the economy in the Arctic regions of Russia]. Sever i rinok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poriadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2023, No 4, pp. 142–156. (In Russ.). doi:10.37614/2220-802X.4.2023.82.010.
  20. Rizov A. D. Osobennosti transformatsii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh protsessov v monoproduktovom regione: problemy i puti ikh resheniya: dis. … kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 [Features of the transformation of socio-economic processes in a mono-product region: Problems and ways to solve them. A PhD (Economics) thesis], Saint Petersburg, 2014, pp. 278. (In Russ.).
  21. Teslya A. B., Bulacheva L. V. Formirovanie i razvitie trudovogo potentsiala Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Formation and development of labour potential of the Russian Federation Arctic zone]. Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Murmansk State Technical University], 2015, No 18 (3). 537–546. (In Russ.).
  22. Zabaikin Yu. V. et al. Tsifrovaya ekonomika: problema obrazovaniya v Rossii [Digital economy: The problem of education in Russia]. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika [Education management review], 2022, No 7 (54), pp. 15–21. (In Russ.).
  23. Troyanskaya M. A., Tyurina Yu. G. Mirovaya praktika tsifrovizatsii v upravlenii monogorodami [World practice of digitization in the management of single-industry towns]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie [Azimuth of scientific research: economics and administration], 2019, Vol. 8, No 2 (27), pp. 341–343. (In Russ.).
  24. Sekushina I. A. Tsifrovizatsiya malykh i srednikh gorodov Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii: tendentsii I perspektivy [Digitalization of small and medium-sized cities in the European North of Russia: Trends and prospects]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast], 2022, No 15 (6), pp. 124–138. (In Russ.).
  25. Ugol’nikova O. D. Tsifrovizatsiya gradoobrazuyushchikh predpriyatii i transformatsiya sotsial’nykh protsessov monogorodov [Digitalization of primary employers and transformation of social processes of monotowns]. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii i voprosy obespecheniya bezopasnosti real’noi ekonomiki [Innovative technologies and issues of ensuring the security of the real economy]. Saint Petersburg, 2022, pp. 117. (In Russ.).
  26. Rizov A. D., Ugol’nikova O. D., Mordovets V. A. Promyshlennaya politika v usloviyakh tsifrovoi transformatsii [Industrial policy in the context of digital transformation]. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii i voprosy obespecheniya bezopasnosti real’noi ekonomiki: sb. nauch. tr. po itogam III Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Innovative technologies and issues of ensuring the security of the real economy: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. Saint Peterburg, SPbGEU, 2021, pp. 134–144. (In Russ.).
  27. Lezina T. A., Yurkova A. D. Analiz trebovanii rabotodatelei k tsifrovym kompetentsiyam sotrudnikov [The analysis of employers’ requirements to digital competencies of employees]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo [Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship], 2018, No 5, pp. 1623–1632. (In Russ.).
  28. Malterud K., Siersma V. D., Guassora A. D. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, No 26 (13), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444.
  29. Kozlov A. et al. Comparative study of socio-economic barriers to development of digital competences during formation of human capital in Russian Arctic, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2019, No 302 (1), pp. 012125.
  30. Gasparovich E. O., Tregubova A. A. Tsifrovye transformatsii v upravlenii kar’eroi personala [Digital transformations in personnel career management]. Vestnik OmGU. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of Omsk State University. Series: Economics], 2022, No 1, pp. 55–63. (In Russ.).
  31. Kozlov A., Kankovskaya A., Teslya A. Digital infrastructure as the factor of innovative development of Arctic regions in framework of Industry 4.0 concept. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2021, No 816 (1), pp. 012012.