CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGIES OF RESOURCE COMPANIES  AS A DRIVER OF COMPETITIVENESS IN ARCTIC SINGLE-INDUSTRY TOWNS

Original article

Download article

Sergei V. Svinin1, Vladimir V. Dyadik2

Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia  2v.dyadik@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-6004-9533

Abstract. This study examines national practices in implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies among resource companies as a means of enhancing not only corporate sustainability but also the socio-economic competitiveness of single-industry towns, or monotowns, in the Russian Arctic. Its scientific novelty lies in identifying the conditions that enhance competitiveness and uncover new sources of socio-economic development for Arctic single-industry towns through the collaborative engagement of all key stakeholders. Specifically, it is proposed that primary employers — resource companies — should play a more active role in this process by leveraging their social responsibility programs in the communities where they operate. The study employs a combination of qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods, including statistical, monographic, and descriptive approaches. The analysis is based on corporate reports from resource companies, official data from regional and municipal authorities, and national statistical sources. Findings indicate that CSR initiatives undertaken by resource companies contribute to the competitiveness of Arctic monotowns, particularly those reliant on mineral resource extraction. However, the study also reveals a misalignment between corporate CSR priorities and municipal development needs, as investments are primarily directed toward internal corporate social programs rather than broader community interests. Future research should focus on identifying the most effective approaches for aligning the strategies of primary employers and local governments to enhance the competitiveness and long-term sustainability  of Arctic single-industry towns.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility (CSR), urban competitiveness, Arctic single-industry towns, socio-economic development, local governance issues, monotowns, stakeholders, Russian Arctic

For citation: Svinin S. V., Dyadik V. V. Corporate social responsibility strategies of resource companies as a driver  of competitiveness in Arctic single-industry towns. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 1, pp. 163–179. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.1.2025.87.011.

References

  1. Krugman P. R. Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1996, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 17–25.
  2. Krugman P. R. Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 1991, No. 99, 483–499. doi: 10.1086/261763.
  3. Jensen-Butler C. Competition between cities, urban performance and the role of urban policy: A theoretical framework. European cities in competition. Edited by C. Jensen-Butler, A. Shachar and J. van Weesep. Avebury, European science foundation, 1997, Vol. 36, Issue 5–6, pp. 795–809.
  4. Begg I. Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, May 1999, Vol. 36, No. 5/6.
  5. Lever W. F. Competitive Cities in Europe. Urban Studies, 1999, vol. 36, no. 5–6, pp. 1029–1044. doi: 10.1080/0042098993349.
  6. Bramezza I. The Competitiveness of the European City and the Role of Urban: Management in Improving the City’s Performance (Tinbergen Institute Research Series nr. 109). Paperback – December 1, 1996.
  7. Borg, J. van der, Bramezza I. and Costa P. The competitiveness of the European metropolitan area in the European urban system of tomorrow. Paper presented to the European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Lisbon, 1991.
  8. Grinev S. A., Kvint V. L. Formirovanie strategicheskikh prioritetov promyshlennogo razvitiya RF kak innovatsionnyi faktor preodoleniya krizisnykh periodov [Formation of strategic priorities of industrial development of the Russian Federation as an innovative factor in overcoming crisis periods]. Ekonomika promyshlennosti [Russian Journal of Industrial Economics], 2023, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 275–283. (In Russ.).
  9. Kvint V. L. Teoreticheskie osnovy i metodologiya strategirovaniya Kuzbassa kak vazhneishego industrial’nogo regiona Rossii [Theoretical basis and methodology of strategizing of the private and public sectors of the Kuzbass region as a medial subsystem of the national economy]. Ekonomika promyshlennosti [Russian Journal of Industrial Economics], 2020. vol. 13, no. 3. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-3-290-299.
  10. Kvint V. L., Novikova I. V., Alimuradov M. K. Soglasovannost’ global’nykh i natsional’nykh interesov s regional’nymi strategicheskimi prioritetami [Alignment of global and national interests with regional strategic priorities]. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management], 2021, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 900–909. (In Russ.).
  11. Kostyleva N. E. Innovatsionnye metody povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti gorodov i regionov [Innovative methods of improving the competitiveness of cities and regions]. Saint Petersburg, IREE RAS Publ., 2005, 243 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Grinchel’ B. M., Nazarova E. A. Territorial’nyi marketing kak instrument povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti gorodov i regionov [Territorial marketing as an instrument for increasing the competitiveness of cities and regions]. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v regionakh i gorodakh Rossii: doklady uchastnikov VII Obshcherossiiskogo foruma liderov strategicheskogo planirovaniya [Proceeding of 7th All-Russ. Sci. Conf. “Strategic Planning in the Regions and Cities of Russia”]. Saint Petersburg, ICSER Leontief Centre Publ., 2009, pp. 102–104. (In Russ.).
  13. Uskova T. V., Barabanov A. S., Popova O. I. Proizvodstvennye klastery i konkurentosposobnost’ regiona [Industrial clusters and the competitiveness of a region]. Vologda, ISEDT RAS Publ., 2010, 246 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Gambeeva Yu. N. Sravnitel’nyi analiz podkhodov k otsenke konkurentosposobnosti territorial’no-organizovannykh ekonomicheskikh sistem [Comparative analysis of approaches to competitiveness assessment of geographically organized economic systems]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo [Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship], 2013, no. 10, 100–113. (In Russ.).
  15. Bogomolova I. V., Mashentsova L. S., Sazonov S. P. Ustoichivoe razvitie krupnykh gorodov s pozitsii otsenki konkurentosposobnosti territorii [Sustainable development of big cities from the positions of an estimation of competitiveness of a territory]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 2014, no. 9–11, 2506–2510. (In Russ.).
  16. Manaeva I. V., Rastvortseva S. N. Metodicheskii instrumentarii otsenki konkurentosposobnosti monogoroda [Methodical tools for assessing the competitiveness of mono-cities]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economy: Theory and Practice], 2016, No. 5 (428), pp. 23–39. (In Russ.).
  17. Kobylinskaya G. V., Fedoseev S. V., Kondratovich D. L., Barasheva T. I. Munitsipal’nye obrazovaniya severnykh regionov Rossiiskoi Federatsii v period pandemii: rezul’taty sotsiologicheskogo oprosa i statisticheskikh issledovanii [Municipalities of Russian northern regions during the pandemic: Results of a sociological survey and statistical research]. Apatity, KSC RAS, 2023, 133 p. doi: 37614/978.5.91137.478.5.
  18. Gushchina I. A., Kondratovich D. L., Polozhentseva O. A. Problemy i puti sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii severnykh i arkticheskikh regionov Rossii [Problems and ways of socio-economic development of municipalities in the northern and Arctic regions of Russia]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2023, no. 7, pp. 162–168. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24158/tipor.2023.7.21.
  19. Dyadik V. V., Kalugina A. S., Borzykh V. N. Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ gradoobrazuyushchego biznesa monogorodov rossiiskoi Arktiki: analiz praktik i motivov (na primere monogorodov Murmanskoi oblasti) [Corporate social responsibility of city-forming companies in company towns of Russian Arctic: Practices and motives (on the Murmansk region company towns example)]. Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Economy of the North-West: Problems and Prospects of Development], 2022, No. 1 (68), pp. 29–41. (In Russ.).
  20. Svinin S. V., Dyadik V. V. Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ promyshlennykh predpriyatii kak faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti regional’nykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem [The corporate social responsibility of industrial enterprises as a factor of increasing the competitiveness of regional socio-economic systems]. Obshhestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Society: Politics, Economics, Law], 2023, no. 5 (118), pp. 137–143. (In Russ.). doi: 24158/pep.2023.5.19.
  21. Ryabova L. A., Didyk V. V. Sotsial’naya litsenziya na deyatel’nost’ resursodobyvayushchikh kompanii kak novyi instrument munitsipal’nogo razvitiya [Social license for resource companies’ activities as a new tool for municipal development]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniia [Public Administration Issues], 2015, No. 3, pp. 61–82. (In Russ.).
  22. Toropushina E. E. Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ vo vremya krizisa: istoricheskii aspect i rossiiskaya arkticheskaya praktika v period pandemii COVID-19 [Corporate social responsibility during the crisis: Historical aspect and Russian Arctic practice during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2022, Vol. 25, No. 4 (78), pp. 167–180. (In Russ.).