PUBLIC-GOVERNMENT INTERACTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCTIC ANCHOR CITIES:  A SOCIOLOGICAL CASE STUDY OF THE MURMANSK REGION

Original article

Download article 

Dmitry L. Kondratovich1, Mikhail V. Ulchenko2, Roman V. Badylevich3

1, 2, 3Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

1k_dim@bk.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4433-8383

2ulchenko23@rambler.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-5227-1772

3ramapatit@rambler.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-3164-8745

Abstract. The development of anchor cities in the Russian Arctic as strategically significant urban centers is gaining momentum, underscoring the need to address local challenges. The relevance of this study lies in the growing need to enhance the effectiveness of local governance by fostering more robust interaction between authorities and residents.  The article presents the results of a sociological study conducted in the anchor cities of the Murmansk Region. The aim is to evaluate, using sociological survey data, the specific features and forms of interaction between local populations and authorities that shape effective mechanisms for civic engagement and urban governance in the Arctic context. The research is based on data from two surveys conducted by the authors in 2024: an expert survey of scholars participating in the  Luzin Readings 2024 academic conference, and a public opinion survey of residents living in the anchor cities of the Murmansk Region. The findings highlight several critical characteristics of public-government interaction in these cities: divergent perceptions of local issues between residents and officials; limited public awareness of governmental activities; the influence of political and economic conditions on civic engagement; the predominantly formal nature of such interactions; and localized factors affecting public interest in social participation. The principal forms of interaction identified include: public participation in decision-making through public hearings; the establishment of advisory councils on matters of urban importance; stakeholder-driven grassroots initiatives (involving authorities, citizens, and civil society organizations); and the provision of consultative support to the population. The study’s scientific novelty lies in its empirical contribution to the theoretical understanding of public-government interaction, achieved through the application of sociological methods.  These findings strengthen the evidence base for more informed, effective decision-making in the socio-economic development of Arctic anchor cities. The practical significance of the research lies in its potential to improve the quality of local governance by fostering greater citizen involvement in shaping the future of these strategically important urban areas.

Keywords: expert survey, public opinion survey, social interaction, social partnership, civic engagement, strategic planning, Arctic anchor cities, Arctic, Murmansk Region

Acknowledgments: This article is based on the research supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 24-28-20111,  “Mechanisms of Interaction Between the Population and Authorities in the Development of Municipalities in the Russian Arctic: Features, Challenges, and Prospects in a New Geopolitical Context”) and the Government of the Murmansk Region.  It also draws on the research conducted at the Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences under Project No. 123012500053-2, “The Scientific Foundations of Social Development Management  In Russia’s Arctic Regions Amid Emerging Global Challenges”.

For citation: Kondratovich D. L., Ulchenko M. V., Badylevich R. V. Public-government interaction in the development of Arctic anchor cities: A sociological case study of the Murmansk Region. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka  [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 2, pp. 69–85. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2025.88.005.

References

  1. Gushchina I. A., Kondratovich D. L., Polozhentseva O. A. Dinamika sotsial’nogo razvitiya territorii Rossiiskoy Arktiki v otsenkakh naseleniya: Murmanskaya oblast’ [Public opinion and social development in the Russian Arctic:  A case study of the Murmansk Region]. Apatity, KSC RAS, 2019, 231 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37614/978.5.91137.418.1. (In Russ.).
  2. Gushchina I. A., Kondratovich D. L., Polozhentseva A. Vozmozhnye riski sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya severnykh i arkticheskikh regionov Rossii v sovremennykh geopoliticheskikh usloviyakh (po rezul’tatam ekspertnykh oprosov) [Possible risks of socio-economic development of the northern and Arctic regions of Russia in modern geopolitical conditions (based on the results of expert surveys)]. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Regional Economy and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal], 2023, no. 4 (76). EDN: DOCRHC. (In Russ.).
  3. Ryabova L. A. Sotsial’nye issledovaniya na Severe i v Arktike Instituta ekonomicheskikh problem im. G. P. Luzina KNTs RAN: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Social studies in the North and the Arctic conducted at the Luzin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Past, present, and future]. Vestnik Kol’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Herald of the Kola Science Centre of RAS], 2011, no. 4, pp. 37–41. EDN: PBNLDL. (In Russ.).
  4. Ryabova L. A. Problemy realizatsii munitsipal’noi sotsial’noi politiki na Rossiiskom Severe i v Arktike [Problems of the implementation of municipal social policy in the Russian North and Arctic]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2012, no. 3 (31), pp. 124a–133. EDN: PDTQQZ. (In Russ.).
  5. Shokhrina M. S., Medvedeva N. V. Mekhanizmy vzaimodeistviya organov munitsipal’noi vlasti s mestnym soobshchestvom v malykh gorodakh [Mechanisms of interaction between municipal authorities and the local community in small towns]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social Policy and Sociology], 2023, Vol. 22, no. 1 (146), pp. 160–168. DOI: 10.17922/2071-3665-2023-22-1-160-168. (In Russ.).
  6. Pyasetskaya E. N. Vybory organami mestnogo samoupravleniya form vzaimodeistviya s naseleniem: opyt ekspertnoi otsenki [Elections by local governments of forms of interaction with the population: the experience of expert assessment]. Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional’naya kul’tura [Ethnosocium and Interethnic Culture], 2014, 3 (69), p. 131. EDN: SYTXUZ. (In Russ.).
  7. Pyasetskaya E. N. Uchastie naseleniya v mestnom samoupravlenii: tendentsii razvitiya [Participation of the population in local government: Development trends]. Politika, ekonomika i innovatsii [Politics, Economics and Innovation], 2017, no. 3 (13), p. 10. EDN: ZPEODN. (In Russ.).
  8. Voroshilov N. V. Otsenka effektivnosti regional’noi politiki po razvitiyu munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii [Evaluation of the effectiveness of regional policy on the development of municipalities]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Cherepovets State University], 2014, no. 7 (60), pp. 54–59. EDN: TOMYKZ. (In Russ.).
  9. Voroshilov N. V. Razvitie gorodskikh aglomeratsii na territorii Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii [Development of urban agglomerations in the European North of Russia]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2021, 26 (4), pp. 54–74. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-4-54-74. (In Russ.).
  10. Durtseva A. G., Osipova L. B. Sotsial’noe vzaimodeistvie organov mestnogo samoupravleniya s naseleniem territorii [Social interaction between municipal authorities and the local population]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education], 2015, no. 1–1, pp. 1493. EDN: VIEZSN. (In Russ.).
  11. Rebysheva L. V., Vasilchenko E. V. Organizatsiya sotsial’nogo vzaimodeistviya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya s naseleniem [Management of social interaction between municipal authorities and the local population]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2015, No. 26 (381),   114–118. EDN: VLZCHN. (In Russ.).
  12. Duke A. V. Instrumenty sotsial’nogo vzaimodeistviya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya s naseleniem [Tools of social interaction of local authorities with population]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2008, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 183–190. EDN: KWVXPN. (In Russ.).
  13. Frolova E. V. Vzaimodeistvie naseleniya i mestnoi vlasti: problemy i novye vozmozhnosti [Interaction of the population and local government: Problems and new opportunities]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 2016, no. 4 (384), pp. 59–64. EDN: VZSLMR. (In Russ.).
  14. Medvedeva N. V., Lamok A. A. Vzaimodeistvie mestnykh organov vlasti i naseleniya v gorodskom okruge: sotsiologicheskaya otsenka [Interaction between local authorities and the population in the urban district: A sociological assessment]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social Policy and Sociology], 2022, Vol. 21, no. 3 (144), pp. 105–114. DOI: 10.17922/2071-3665-2022-21-3-105-114. (In Russ.).
  15. Eremin A. A., Ilyin V. N., Lomova N. G., Lyakisheva V. G., Mel’nikova N. S., Samsonova T. N., Sergienko A. M., Timchenko L. L. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Topical issues in municipal management: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Berlin, Direct Media Publ., 2014, 277 p. EDN: TYRRIT. (In Russ.).
  16. Kuzmicheva A. A. Informatsionnaya politika organov mestnogo samoupravleniya kak faktor formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v RF [Information policy of local governments as a factor in the formation of civil society in the Russian Federation]. Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional’naya kul’tura [Ethnosocium and Interethnic Culture], 2020, No. 2 (140), pp. 9–17. EDN: MDNBHT. (In Russ.).
  17. Murodova N. S. Spetsificheskie vzaimodeistviya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva i sotsial’nogo gosudarstva v protsesse modernizatsii [Specific interactions of civil society institutions and the welfare state in the process of modernization]. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki [Successes of Modern Science], 2017, Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 233–235.  EDN: YRORBB. (In Russ.).
  18. Drobyshev D. M. Otsenka vzaimodeistviya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya s naseleniem v g. o. Samara [Assessment of the interaction of local self-government bodies with the population in the city of Samara]. Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoi ekonomiki [Topical Issues of Modern Economics], 2022, no. 8, pp. 206–213. EDN: NKCKFS. (In Russ.).
  19. Mendez C., Batchler J. European identity and citizen attitudes to cohesion policy: What do we know? Glasgow, Glasgow, European Policies Research Centre, 2017, 43 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580630.
  20. David O., Bar-Tal D. A sociopsychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity as an example. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2009, 13 (4), pp. 354–379. DOI:1177/1088868309344412.
  21. Konyshev V. N., Lagutina M. L. Bezopasnost’ cheloveka v Arktike: ugrozy skvoz’ prizmu “severnogo mentaliteta” [Human security in the Arctic: Threats through the prism of the “northern mentality”]. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 2021, no. 45, pp. 85–112. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.45.85.